Actually, it was a strong argument in favor of the opposite: that people required a strong, central, absolute authority to control them and shield them from man's base natural state.
As such, revolt was anathema to Hobbes - indeed, his central work Leviathan is written expressly as a response to the upheavals of the English Civil Wars and revolutions on the Continent.
However, other writings by Hobbes also help define the "proper" nature of the relationship between a government and its citizenry, including much of the foundation for the modern Western ideas of Liberal Government. It can be argued that such writing define what is a "proper" government, and that people, finding themselves under an "improper" government, should be fully justified in seeking to replace it at will.
what were thomas hobbes's ideas
what were thomas hobbes's ideas
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy
i think they were and should be very interesting
Thomas Hobbes
It was how he farted a lot
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy.right answer: They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.The differnce in ideas between Thomas Hobbes and john Locke can be best described as ideological because Hobbes thinks that mankind is 'self-interested' while Locke thinks that natural law presupposes that all humans are created equal and independent.
Philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau opposed Thomas Hobbes' ideas. They disagreed with his pessimistic view of human nature and his belief in absolute monarchy, instead advocating for ideas like natural rights and social contract theory.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a social contract theory where individuals agree to give up some of their freedoms in exchange for protection and security by a strong central authority. He argued that humans are naturally selfish and competitive, leading to a state of constant war without this social contract. Hobbes believed in a sovereign ruler with absolute power to maintain order and prevent chaos.
They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.