Political parties and political attitudes shape government by influencing policy agendas, electoral outcomes, and public opinion, thereby guiding decision-making processes. Government bureaucracies gain power through their expertise, continuity, and capacity to implement policies, often becoming essential in the functioning of government. In the pluralist model, power is distributed among various interest groups that compete for influence, while in the elite model, power is concentrated in a small number of individuals or organizations that dominate political and economic resources.
In sociology and political science, elitist theory of government argues that power is held by a small group of people. Elite theorists included Elmer Eric Schattschneider, Thomas R. Dye, and James Burnham.
Neither. That which does not exist cannot have a political perspective.
Public opinion
Political socialization is the process by which people acquire political beliefs and attitudes.
political attitudes
Political socialization
Political Socialization
Political Socialization
Serguei E. Grigoriev has written: 'Regional economic development and political attitudes of the population of Russia' -- subject(s): Research, Political psychology, Political sociology, Voting, Politics and government, Political participation
Political socialization
Political Socialization
Arguments against a political pluralist distribution of power in the U.S. often focus on the potential for fragmentation and inefficiency in governance. Critics argue that too many competing interests can lead to gridlock, making it difficult to achieve consensus on important issues. Additionally, the influence of powerful interest groups may overshadow the voices of ordinary citizens, undermining democratic representation. Finally, the complexity of a pluralist system can create confusion and disengagement among voters, reducing overall political participation.