Persia, also known as Iran operates under a Theocratic Islamic Republic. The president is democratically elected, but the Supreme leader must validate the person before they can even run for office. The religious leader or Ayatollah remains the supreme voice of the land, with the president answerable to him.
i don't no try bing but they have links so bing lied
The ancient Egyptian system of government was a Theocratic Monarchy. The Pharaoh was both King/Emperor and a God.
A number of countries have a Theocratic type of government in theory, however none except Vatican City are entirely theocratic. Iran, Saudi Arabia are the primary examples of theocratic style governments, however both have houses of Parliament and elected officials who do hold considerable power. Iran is ruled by the Grand Mullah who seems to be the final arbiter in government, but non-religious government officials are gaining strength as the blowback to repressive government by theocracy. Saudi Arabia of course is ruled by a monarchy and the King seems willing to overrule the theocratic elements of the government when it seems necessary. There is also Israel with it's programs of promoting the country as the Jewish Homeland and incorporation of Jewish Torah precepts into law and running state-run Jewish religious schools. Norway is also a theocratic tinged country with a state religion and laws concerning how many legislatures must be members of the state religion.
A theocracy is a government controlled by religious leaders. A republic is a state that has got rid of its Monarch. Iran is both of these. However, historical experience teaches the world that theocracies are in general not very nice places to live in - when people think that they have divine guidance they tend to do terrible things.
A theocracy is a government ruled by divine guidance or by a person considered to be divine. The Romans never considered their living rulers to be divine, but they certainly asked for divine guidance in their undertakings, both major and minor. The counsuls would look for omens before bringing up any important issues before the senate. The omens would always be taken before a battle. Omen readings and sacrifices would always accompany the dedication of a building, and so on. Thanksgiving was always given to some god or another after a success. On the basis of this evidence, one would have to say, yes, the Romans had a theocratic government.
The Aztec government was a theocratic monarchy led by an emperor, who was both a political and religious leader. The emperor was supported by a council of nobles and priests, who helped govern and make decisions. The empire was divided into city-states called "altepetl," each ruled by a local leader or "tlatoani" who reported to the emperor. This hierarchical system allowed for centralized control while accommodating local governance.
Both state and federal government
Stalin and Lenin policies are believe to be quite similar. They are both communistic in structure, and aim to illuminate theocratic traditions. Socialism interested them. However in difference Stalin thought it best to start with western strategy. He also believe that the government should control all matters concerning the economy advancement.
they both wanted a powerful government
They both are types of government, and both have a person/group of people who govern.
Can a government be both a monarchy and an anarchy at the same time
Yes, both the Missouri government and the US federal government have 3 branches. The branches are executive, legislative, and judicial.