0
He ruled with an iron fist and an aggressive tone when it came to his empire. He had a large empire and a large army to defend it and gain new land. The immense wealth of his land and his nobles demonstrated his power and was sometimes rather overbearing. He easily became the most powerful and hardest working ruler in Europe. He did not trust many people and would not allow anyone to help him; as a true absolute monarch would.
What else can I help you with?
Philip II's anti-protestant policies did not lead to what?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
What Philip II's anti-Protestant policies did NOT lead to?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
What did not Philip anti Protestant policies lead to?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
Philip II's anti-protestant policies did not lead to which of the following?
He believed in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch -NovaNet
Was Philip the 2 an absolute monarch?
If you mean Philip II of Spain, then yes, he was definitely an absolute monarch. At that time, England was the only country in Europe with any kind of democratic or representational body to limit the king's (or queen's) power, and even they didn't have much power.
Who was reigning monarch in the Spanish armada?
Queen Elizabeth in England and King Philip in Spain.
What can you conclude about Philip ii?
He was an absolute monarch who badly defeated the Ottomans, tried to marry Queen Elizabeth I to change Protestants to Catholicism, made peace with France, and mandated religious reforms for the Netherlands.
Who was the most famous absolute monarch from Spain?
The most famous absolute monarch from Spain was King Philip II, who reigned from 1556 to 1598. He is known for his extensive empire, which included territories in Europe, the Americas, and Asia, and for his staunch defense of Catholicism during the Protestant Reformation. Philip II's centralized rule and ambitious military campaigns, including the ill-fated Spanish Armada, significantly shaped Spain's history and influence during the 16th century. His reign is often seen as the height of Spanish power and cultural achievement.
What would have happen to Spain if Philip II was not an absolute monarch?
If Philip II had not been an absolute monarch, Spain might have experienced a more decentralized political structure, allowing for greater regional autonomy and potentially fostering a more diverse range of political thought and governance. This could have mitigated some of the internal conflicts and tensions that arose under his centralized rule, possibly leading to a more stable and prosperous society. Additionally, without absolute rule, Spain might have been more adaptable in responding to external challenges, such as the rise of Protestantism and competition from other European powers. Ultimately, a less autocratic Philip II could have altered Spain's trajectory in terms of both its domestic policies and its imperial ambitions.
Was Leopold the first an absolute monarch?
your mom was an absolute monarch
What was a common goal of Philip ii of Spain and Louis xiv of France?
maintain absolute power
What term applies to a king or queen or emperor with total power?
absolute monarch
