They always have to.
If Lincoln hadn't jailed the pro-Southern leaders in Maryland, that state would have voted Confederate, and Washington DC would have been totally enclosed within enemy states.
if i knew the answer i wouldnt be looking for an answer
they were justified just as Javarius Jamar Javarsion-Lamar once said
It decreased citizens rights
This question has troubled humans since the Antiquity. Governments say yes, but citizens say no. At the end of the day, I believe that in wartime situations, certain civil liberties can be suppressed. The government has the duty to protect the well-being of all its citizens, and if the lives of millions are at stake, and the best chance at saving those lives are suppressing certain rights, than I feel the government is just in doing so.But it is important that once the immediate danger is past, liberties are restored. And if the government cannot do that in a timely matter, they are failing as a government and should be abolished, and a new government should be established. As the book 1984 showed, by keeping people in perpetual fear, the government can quash all civil liberties.
during the civil war washington D.c was the capital of the union
False
These acts directly affected the first amendment and took away people's freedom of free speech. These extreme laws would not be tolerated today by the people and it would be hard for the government to control because of the internet and the other many forms of communication.
How were civil liberties denied Japanese Americans during World War II.
I have the same question
Civil Liberties Act
Suspending writs of habeas corpus during the Civil War allowed the government to detain individuals without immediate trial or formal charges, aimed at maintaining public order and suppressing dissent. This controversial measure, enacted by President Abraham Lincoln, was justified as necessary for national security, particularly in response to threats from Confederate sympathizers and unrest in border states. Critics argued it violated constitutional rights, highlighting the tension between civil liberties and wartime security. Ultimately, the suspension reflected the challenges of governance during a period of intense national crisis.
Because of the Civil War in the North, income tax was invented.