0
What else can I help you with?
One can be a supporter of human rights without necessarily being a supporter of democracy. To what extent would you agree with this statement?
I wouldn't agree with that statement to any extant. Look at every country that isn't under a democracy or a republic, they have little to no human rights.
A supporter of Jacksonian democracy would favor the idea of?
A government service equally open to all individuals
What is the relationship of the slaveholder to the overseer to the slaves on the plantation?
The slaveholder owns the plantation and the slaves. The overseer is hired by the slaveholder to manage the day-to-day operations of the plantation and supervise the slaves. The slaves work under the oversight of the overseer and are considered property of the slaveholder, subject to their control and exploitation.
Did angelica grimke had experience as a slaveholder?
Yes
Can you put democracy in a sentence?
"Democracy works as long as the voters are informed, and realistic about the things government can and should do." "Many school students participate in democracy through their student councils." "Democracy, a government ruled by its people, was originally applied by Aristotle to a form of mob rule."
Was Andrew Johnson a slaveholder?
yes but not while he was president
Why was indirect democracy a necessary alternative to direct democracy?
No, a direct democracy could always be possible, though largely impracticable in larger states.
Does Madison say it is possible to have a tyranny in a democracy?
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Does Madison say it is possible to have tyranny in democracy?
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Does Madison say its possible to have tyranny in a democracy?
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
What is the possible system of Afghanistan?
Afghanistan is a possible democracy, and possibly can revert to Islamic theocracy.
Scott v. Sandford decided that slaves brought into free territory were automatically freed?
No, it decided exactly the opposite. Slaves that got into free territories remained the property of the slaveholder and had to be returned to the slaveholder, because the Supreme Court declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.
