yes
It does not seem possible or probable that true democracy could be created in Central Asia without full scale violent revolutions.
Technically, no, if a "true" Democracy refers to a system where all citizens have a direct voice in government. True democracies cannot scale beyond a few hundred (or at most, a couple of thousand) citizens. The United States is a constitutionally-limited, federal representative republican democracy, in political science terms.
J. Eric Oliver has written: 'Democracy in Suburbia' 'Local elections and the politics of small-scale democracy' -- subject(s): Local elections, Democracy 'Fat Politics' -- subject(s): Health, Health Policy, Nonfiction, Obesity, OverDrive, Politics, Prejudice, Social perception
liberal democracy. Democracy altogether. socialist democracy. Democracy elite. A pluralist democracy.
The democracy in ancient Athens was a direct democracy. The democracy in the United States was a representative democracy.
Define regular democracy. A democracy is a government by the people. A direct democracy is a type of democracy.
A direct democracy
Not necessarily, no - for example Britain with its firmly established and stable democracy (which can be considered a 'strong' government) could not prevent a large-scale financial disaster.
in a democracy
democracy means choosing their leader by them and freedom
How does direct democracy differ from reprecentative democracy
Mostly. The people in a party pick their candidate, and the people of the nation pick which candidate they prefer. Of course strictly speaking we don't live in a democracy, we live in a republic - in a direct democracy every citizen votes on policy and takes turns serving as legislative, executive, and judicial figures (a la Athens in ancient greece). Of course that doesn't scale up very well, and a republic is an acceptable alternative.