There are no political freedom in monarchy. It has a king who does what he wants and then there is everybody else.
There are no political freedom in monarchy. It has a king who does what he wants and then there is everybody else.
constitutional monarchy :)
The government is a elective constitutional monarchy. This means there is a prime minister and a monarchy at the head of state. Yet, the country has been rated as an authoritarian country. In 1997 coup overturned the government and analysts say the rule of law and freedoms have not taken hold. So, to answer this question I would say there are no freedoms at this time.
In an absolute monarchy, the liberty and freedom of the monarch are absolute, and the liberty and freedom of the subjects of the monarch are whatever the monarch chooses to give them.
monarchy- all power under king and no freedom of peoples
decreased the power of Louis XVILed to the creation of the Legislative Assembly
He wanted to see a new country where the citizens and not a monarchy had say in what would happen, what freedoms there would be and what taxes would be paid.
Morocco has a Unitary parliamentary constitutional hereditary monarchy. Their current king is Mohammed VI and their current prime minister is Abdelilah Benkirane.However, most power is concentrated in the monarch, not the parliament.Morrocco is a constitutional monarchy where the King has no real political power BUT the current government allows limited democracy, with limits on freedoms.
japan is a consitutional monarchy for shure but i dont know about the other two.
In a monarchy, the rights of individuals can vary significantly depending on whether the monarchy is absolute or constitutional. In absolute monarchies, the monarch holds extensive power, and individual rights may be limited, often subject to the ruler's discretion. In constitutional monarchies, citizens typically enjoy more rights and freedoms, as the monarchy is bound by a constitution or laws that protect civil liberties. Ultimately, the extent of rights in a monarchy largely depends on the country's legal framework and governance structure.
No. In a democracy the restriction of freedoms should never be an issue. If this happens, it will cease to be a democracy.