In one sense, there really is no similarity beyond that there is some form of leader or group of leaders of many people, and that the governed have some mechanism(s) to replace faulty government - Democracy votes, Dictatorships are forced to revolt or otherwise force the leader out of office. However, Democracy and a Dictatorship are two polar opposite forms of government. One is government of the people, by the people, where all of the governed choose representatives to speak in public office, vote, and generally agree on decisions before they are made. Each part of a democratic government holds a part of the power, and the people can take that power away and give it to somebody that they deem more fit for the task. In a dictatorship, there is a sole leader. A specific person or group usually chooses that leader, or in some cases, that leader takes over by force. The leader does not need to listen to their people, they make their own decisions. There is no share of power; the dictator has absolute power, including over their own position as dictator. While both are perfectly capable of both great good and great corruption, the way in which they work by bare definition is exactly opposite from one another.
pie
Monarchy, democracy, and dictatorship are all forms of government that involve the exercise of power and authority over a state or community. Each system can influence the distribution of power, whether it's centralized in a single ruler (monarchy and dictatorship) or shared among the populace (democracy). Additionally, all three can impact citizens' rights and freedoms, though the extent and nature of those rights vary significantly between the systems. Lastly, these forms of governance can coexist with various political ideologies and cultural contexts, shaping their implementation and function.
The similarities between a monarchy and constitutional monarchy are that their are both monarchies.
The Communist (Stalin's) revolution led from an absolute Monarchy to a dictatorship run by Joseph Stalin. The American revolution Led from administration by a parliamentary Monarchy to a Democracy.
This depends on what powers the monarch retains. If the monarch is an absolutist, monarchy will be in opposition to democracy. However, numerous monarchies are constitutional monarchies where the monarch has ceded some or most of his power to democratically elected institutions.
there really is none the only similarity is that sometimes in a dictatorship you vote for the dictator and in a parlimentary democracy you vote for representatives
everything, libertarianism is democracy and democracy is libertarianism.
If the monarchy is not a constitutional monarchy, then essentially they are all dictatorships.
According to the Democracy Index, it's in the limbo between being a democracy and a dictatorship (similar to Russia).
There are elections.
The comparison between democracy and dictatorship entails comparing the rights enjoyed by the citizens under each. Under dictatorship, the government has the power from the military hence intimidation and oppression is rampant. The plus side is that it boasts lower crime rates. Under democracy, the citizenry are free and enjoy all their basic human rights. The downside though, is that the decision making machinery is slow. The different types of democracy are direct, indirect and elite democracy. The types of dictatorship are Communism, monarchy, oligarchy and fascism.
In a democracy, the people have control of the government; in a Dictatorship, one person has control of the government.A democracy is when the people rule the government and a dictatorship is when one or a small group of people rule the gobernment such as a military leader