answersLogoWhite

0

He claimed to have a list of Communists and their actions, however this was never seen and neither was any other concrete evidence presented.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why was senator McCarthy able to win recognition as a great fighter of communism without actually identifying any Communists?

He was able to win recognition by just stating there were 205 known communists, and waving around a supposed list which he claimed contained the names of 57 communists in the state department. This being done frightened Americans to which at that time didn't make them think about having evidence, they just figured he was on the right track.


How did the McCarthy era grow out of the hunt for communist at home?

McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence. During the McCarthy era, thousands of Americans were accused of being Communists or communist sympathizers.


What Is McCarthysim?

McCarthyism mean making unfair accusations of disloyalty without evidence. The term is named after Senator Joseph McCarthy who in the 1950s accused thousands of Americans of being communists or communist sympathizers.


What originally prompted senator Joseph McCarthy to claim that he held in his hand the names of 205 known communists in the state department?

It was a publicity stunt. Senator Joseph R. McCarthy saw Republicans like Richard Nixon gain popularity through accusing Democrats of being "soft on communism," and he decided to imitate this.


Did Joseph McCarthy ever show the list he said he had known of the Communists in the State Department?

Joseph McCarthy claimed to have a list of Communists working in the State Department, but he never provided concrete evidence or a definitive list to substantiate his allegations. His accusations, primarily made during a speech in 1950, were largely based on unverified information and led to widespread fear and paranoia during the Red Scare. Ultimately, McCarthy's tactics were widely criticized, and he failed to prove his claims in a credible manner.


Why was McCarthy able to wield so much power during the S's?

McCarthy was able to wield so much power during the 1950s due to his anti-communist crusade in America, fueled by the fear of the spread of communism during the Cold War. He took advantage of this fear to conduct highly publicized hearings, accusing individuals of being communists or communist sympathizers without substantial evidence, damaging their reputations and careers. Additionally, the media played a significant role in amplifying McCarthy's messages, aiding in his rise to power.


What was Sen. Joe McCarthy doing during the Korean war?

He was being a junior Senator, starting up his anti-Communist rhetoric and accusing all and sundry of being Communists, mostly on no evidence at all or on the basis of hear-say that he presented as facts.


Could it be that atheism is being used by communists to influence America?

No, there is no evidence of this. While these sorts of assertions were very popular during the McCarthy era in the early 1950s (and led to the phrase "under God" being added to the pledge of allegiance, to demonstrate that Americans believed in God and were not like Communists, who were atheists), America has always been a religiously identified country, with large percentages of Americans (some polls show as many as 75-80%) saying they believe in God, and believe in their religion. There have also always been a percentage (currently about 14%) who do not believe in any religion, but these people are not Communists; they are free-thinkers, Humanists, and followers of other secular-based philosophies. There is no reason to believe that Communists, who make up a very small minority in North America, will ever have enough influence to change anyone's mind, nor is there evidence that Communists from other countries would be able to influence the religiosity of so many Americans.


Who was the American senator who whipped up a new red scare about communists spies and symphasixers in America?

The American senator who famously whipped up a new red scare about communist spies and sympathizers in the early 1950s was Joseph McCarthy. He gained notoriety for his aggressive investigations and claims that numerous communists had infiltrated the U.S. government and other institutions. This period, known as McCarthyism, was characterized by heightened paranoia and widespread accusations, often without substantial evidence. McCarthy's tactics ultimately led to significant controversy and backlash against his methods.


How was McCarthyism a threat to constitutional rights?

It threatened peoples rights to privacy. Also McCarthy often never had proper evidence, warrants, or proof of his communist accusations. Although he did help to weed out some communists in office, he also injustly accused many who were innocent. :)


During the red scare many were accused of being communist even with out evidence to prove it what was this called?

During the Red Scare, the phenomenon of accusing individuals of being communists without substantial evidence was often referred to as "McCarthyism," named after Senator Joseph McCarthy. This period was characterized by heightened paranoia and the aggressive pursuit of suspected communists in government, entertainment, and other sectors. Allegations were frequently based on hearsay or political motivations rather than concrete proof, leading to widespread fear and injustice.


Was Joseph McCarthy involved in the civil rights?

Joseph McCarthy was not directly involved in the civil rights movement; his focus was primarily on anti-communism during the early 1950s. He is best known for his role in the Red Scare, where he accused many individuals of being communists, often without substantial evidence. While his actions created a climate of fear that affected various social movements, including civil rights, McCarthy himself did not advocate for or support civil rights initiatives. In fact, his tactics often undermined the broader fight for equality by fostering a divisive political environment.