Simply put, knowledge derived from faith is commonly called belief. In many scientific models, such knowledge is often called axiomatic, given, or tautological.
Faith knowledge is based on personal beliefs, convictions, or spiritual experiences that often do not require empirical evidence or rational justification. In contrast, consensus knowledge is derived from collective agreement among a group, typically grounded in shared evidence, research, or observable phenomena. While faith knowledge is subjective and deeply personal, consensus knowledge aims for objectivity through communal validation and critical discourse. Thus, they serve different purposes in understanding truth and reality.
When scientific knowledge is correct, it will fit the Bible-derived framework.
Faith knowledge is based on belief in something, while consensus knowledge is based on accepting something if others believe it to be true.
Faith can be a source of personal conviction and belief, but it is not considered a reliable or testable pathway to knowledge in the same way as empirical evidence or logic. Faith is subjective and varies greatly among individuals, so what one person believes based on faith may not necessarily be considered knowledge by others.
We are saved by faith (spiritual) and not of ourselves (rationality) lest any man should boast. Knowledge that is based solely on faith may possibly be supported by rationally derived knowledge, but it cannot be undone by refutations that come from rationally derived knowledge. I am talking about the most sublime faith, the faith that is one's salvation. We can't demand it, and we can't even seek it. Yes, there is the sinner's prayer, but faith is entirely God's act and not any of ours, "lest any man should boast". Whether or not God ALWAYS grants this faith to those who ask is for anothers to speculate upon. The basic truth from a faith perspective is that once in possession of this faith, the faith is seen and experienced as different from any natural faith that comes about by rational processes.People of faith see dedication to science and rationality as futile, but some of them don't 'get' that people who do not have faith cannot possibly see the world through the perspective of people who do. And arguing science or religion with such unfaithful will accomplish nothing; coming to faith simplythrough someone's rational argument is not possible; it comes from the Spirit, in whatever way the Spirit chooses to act.People dedicated to gaining knowledge through rational processes see 'faith based knowledge' as a pipedream at best, and some of them don't 'get' that trying to convince people of faith otherwise is a waste of time. No amount of facts and figures, however convincing, should be able to undo what is spiritually discerned.It all hinges on faith.
Knowledge is based on facts, Faith is based on "nothing" (a dream, a hope, a wish).
Faith = conscious knowledge To know and know that you know, and to believe in that knowledge. (This is only one meaning of "faith". There are many. But it is perhaps the most important.)
Empiricism
Logistics is by far the knowledge needed; and gained once accomplished.
Knowledge derived from recorded facts is called empirical knowledge. This type of knowledge is based on direct observations or experiences that have been recorded and documented. It forms the foundational basis for many fields of study such as science, history, and social sciences.
Knowledge Katti is a young multi millionaire from Namibia. He derived his wealth from his career in television.
Hare Krishna is a religious Indian movement who's beliefs are derived from Indian scriptures. It was formed to spread the knowledge of Bhakti yoga which is a practice of cultivating love, submission to God, and complete faith.