What were arguments against Grutter v Bollinger?

Answer 1

Arguments against Grutter v. Bollinger centered on the claim that affirmative action in university admissions undermines the principle of meritocracy and can lead to reverse discrimination against non-minority students. Critics argued that such policies could perpetuate racial stereotypes and diminish the value of individual achievement, as applicants may be judged primarily on their race rather than their qualifications. Additionally, opponents contended that the use of race in admissions could create division and resentment among students, ultimately undermining the intended goals of diversity and equality.