supreme court
It is an approach made by the constitution.
Under 'Article 226' of the constitution if any of the fundamental rights of a person is infringed he can file a petition to the high court for the issue of directions or order or writs in the nature of habeas corpus,mandamus,prohibition,certiorari,quo warranto if there is no adequate remedy available or he can directly approach supreme court . when any other right of a person is infringed he should first approach high court and not supreme court. thus supreme court is the guarantor and protector of fundamental rights
authority :)ability approach attitude
Delegating authority!
Structuralism
The Connecticut and Massachusetts constitutions differ primarily in their structure and approach to governance. Connecticut's constitution, established in 1638-1639, was based on a Fundamental Orders framework that emphasized a more direct form of self-governance and was less formal than Massachusetts'. In contrast, Massachusetts adopted a more structured constitution in 1780, which included a clear separation of powers and a stronger emphasis on individual rights. Additionally, Massachusetts had a more centralized government compared to Connecticut's more decentralized approach.
realistic
realistic
Right to constitutional remedies is itself is a Fundamental Right. This right makes other rights effective. It is possible that sometimes our rights may be violated by fellow citizens, private bodies or by the government. When any of our rights are violated we can seek remedy through courts. If it is a Fundamental Right we can directly approach the Supreme Court or the High Court of a state. That is why Dr. Ambedkar called the Right to Constitutional Remedies, 'the heart and soul' of our Constitution.
The three fundamental approaches to textual criticism are eclectic, stemmatic, and copy-text. Eclectic approach involves selecting readings from various sources, stemmatic approach constructs a family tree of manuscripts to determine their relationships, and copy-text approach selects a single base text as the primary source for the edition.
President Jackson was in favor of loose construction because he believed in a broad interpretation of the Constitution. He viewed the federal government as having more power and authority, allowing it to take action in areas not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. This approach allowed him to pursue his policy agenda effectively.
Yes, the incorporation controversy regarding the application of the Bill of Rights to the states typically involves four main approaches: the total incorporation approach, which argues that all provisions of the Bill of Rights apply to the states; the selective incorporation approach, which asserts that only certain rights are applicable through the Fourteenth Amendment; the fundamental rights approach, which focuses on rights essential to the notion of liberty; and the "no incorporation" approach, which holds that the Bill of Rights applies solely to the federal government. Each approach reflects differing interpretations of the Constitution and the intentions of the framers.