The Connecticut and Massachusetts constitutions differ primarily in their structure and approach to governance. Connecticut's constitution, established in 1638-1639, was based on a Fundamental Orders framework that emphasized a more direct form of self-governance and was less formal than Massachusetts'. In contrast, Massachusetts adopted a more structured constitution in 1780, which included a clear separation of powers and a stronger emphasis on individual rights. Additionally, Massachusetts had a more centralized government compared to Connecticut's more decentralized approach.
How did the massachusetts state constitution 1780 differ from most of the other state constituions?
Connecticut!
Massachusetts, Connecticut and a maritime border with New York.
Massachusetts
The USS Constitution is docked in Boston, Massachusetts
Fundamental Orders of Connecticut the Massachusetts constitution
Fundamental Orders of Connecticut the Massachusetts constitution
finders of connecticut were jews
How did the massachusetts state constitution 1780 differ from most of the other state constituions?
bwaa
At that time Massachusetts was the colony that acted like a state. So, their constitution was set up a different way. Today the Massachusetts constitution is the oldest one. They have not came up with a new constitution since the first.
Connecticut is the farther state when compared to Massachusetts. Connecticut is located to the south of Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Bay colony was ruled by a governor while Connecticut had an adopted plan of union called the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, a written constitution, or plan of government. -by someone else who had this for homework ;3
Both "Massachusetts" and "Connecticut" are misspelled.
Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont
Connecticut
Massachusetts and New York border Connecticut to the north.