SOCIAL DARWINISM was a prominent intellectual theory that was used to justify European Imperialism in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
Social Darwinism held that those made better or worse by industrialization were based on the natural predisposition of the people effected. For those who were made better off, the success of those people demonstrated that they had a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures, which were those "chosen" by the fact that they were performing poorly.
All in all, according to the Social Darwinist, Imperialism was the natural expansion and success of a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures.
european Imperialism in the late 19th century
They didn't, Imperialism is a justification in of its self. The idea that the conquering of savage ignorant and uncivlised cultures in the glorious name of your home land, hardly an original idea.
European imperialism was started by Portugal
European imperialism was motivated by a desire for economic gains in both regions.
It didn't
European imperialism after the Industrial Revolution was more widespread than earlier forms of imperialism.
European imperialists often justified their actions and beliefs through the theory of Social Darwinism, which applied the concept of "survival of the fittest" to human societies. They argued that European races were superior and therefore entitled to dominate and civilize "inferior" cultures. This framework also supported the idea that imperialism was a natural and beneficial process for spreading progress and civilization. Additionally, the notion of the "White Man's Burden" suggested that Europeans had a moral obligation to govern and uplift colonized peoples.
european Imperialism after the industrial revolution was more widespread than earlier forms of imperialism
True, The end to European imperialism came about after the war.
It suggested that powerful countries had the right to rule over weaker countries.
It suggested that powerful countries had the right to rule over weaker countries.
it provided a justifacation for colonzing lesser people