0
Who unfairly influence the nominating process under the convention system in the 1800?
Party bosses
What else can I help you with?
Who unfairly influenced the nominating process under the convention system in the 1800s?
Party bosses
Who unfairly influenced the nominating process under the convention system in the 1800?
Party bosses
After which party convention did the Democrats force major changes in the presidential nominating process?
1968 - After Humphrey narrowly lost the 1968 general election to Richard Nixon, reform-minded Democrats forced changes in the nominating process.
During which period did the Democrats force major changes in the presidential nominating process that are still in effect today?
It was in 1968 that the Democrats forced significant changes in the nominating process that remain intact today. This happened after the Democratic National Convention.
Why are party activists so important in the presidential nomination process?
Because they are often "super delegates" that get to vote in the nominating process. Thus they can disproportionate influence in the nomination.
How has the nominating process in American politics changed over time?
There is no national nominating process in the United States. Local - County - State - Federal elections all have their own nominating process and qualifications (residency, age, number of supportive voters to qualify, perhaps education)and the successful candidate must satisfy those specific requirements.
Which of the following best described the process by which parties select their nominees for president?
citizens vote for delegates in primaries and caucuses and delegates then select the candidate at a national nominating convention
What developed the national convention system for nominating presidential candidates?
The national convention system for nominating presidential candidates was developed by the Democratic Party in the early 19th century. This system was established to provide a more formal and inclusive process for selecting candidates, allowing party members from different states to come together and choose their nominee. The convention system has since been adopted by other political parties in the United States.
Why is a closed primary favored over an open primary?
Closed primaries make it difficult for members of one political party to influence the nominating process of the other
How does the presidential nominating process illustrates process of the constitutional change and development?
The presidential nominating process illustrates constitutional change and development because it shows the power of a democracy. Over time the nominating process has changed significantly and gives everyone a chance verses just a certain type of person.
What was the closed-party process for nominating candidates replaced with?
primaries
What factors led to the convention replacing the caucus as widely used nominating method?
The convention replaced the caucus as the primary nominating method due to several factors, including the desire for greater transparency and inclusivity in the political process. The caucus system often favored party elites and limited participation, while conventions allowed for broader voter engagement and representation. Additionally, the rise of the Progressive movement in the early 20th century advocated for reforms that promoted direct democracy and reduced the influence of political machines, leading to the adoption of conventions as a more democratic approach to candidate selection.
