0
What else can I help you with?
What it means when psychologists state that scientific theories must be supported by empirical evidence.?
When psychologists state that scientific theories must be supported by empirical evidence, they are emphasizing the importance of using objective data and observations to validate or refute their theories. Empirical evidence refers to information that is obtained through systematic investigation and observation in the real world, rather than relying on personal opinions or beliefs. This process helps ensure that psychological theories are based on reliable and verifiable information, promoting the credibility and validity of the field.
Differences between psychology and common sense?
Psychology is backed by evidence. common sense is not backed by evidence and can not be proved to be right or wrong, Psychology must be backed by hard evidence and must have proof and experiments done to prove this .
The APA code of ethics states that all research participants must be given a full explanation of the nature and purpose of any study after its conclusion This process is called?
This process is called a debriefing.
For a scientific claim to be meaningful it must be capable of being disproven This is the critical thinking principle of?
falsifiability. This principle suggests that for a scientific claim to be valid, it must be testable and potentially refutable through evidence and observation. By being able to be disproven, scientific claims can be rigorously tested and evaluated for accuracy.
What is the difference between an absolute threshold and a decision threshold?
An absolute threshold was seen as a hypothetical barrier that incoming stimuli must overcome before they can be perceived, it was based on the ability to pass through the threshold based on absolute judgements about a single stimulus. In the case where a person were to, for example- detect a light, the strength of said light would have to be strong enough to pass the threshold for an observer to perceive it, it was generally based on the observer's ability to detect a signal.In reality however, there is no such threshold that splits the stimulus dimension into detectable and undetectable components. Rather, a stimulus must yield a sensation that exceeds the decision criterion (beta) for even the weakest signal to be perceived, so a decision threshold is the stimulus that elicits the response or perception. The detectability and reporting of the presence of a signal- or the light- are both factors because the decision threshold must be passed and the results from the strength of the stimulus, for example the light- as well the evidence of yielding such strength, must be plausible. Only in this case, do we have correct detection of a signal.
If it is valid when a conclusion must be based on what?
A conclusion must be based on sound reasoning and relevant evidence. It should follow logically from the premises or information provided, ensuring that the relationship between them is clear and justifiable. Additionally, the quality and reliability of the evidence play a crucial role in determining the validity of the conclusion.
When is a conclusion valid?
A conclusion is valid when it logically follows from the premises or evidence provided. It means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity in reasoning ensures that the conclusion is sound and reasonable based on the information presented.
What does it mean to say that a scientific question must be supportable?
Saying a scientific question must be supportable means it must be answerable through evidence-based methods and data. It implies that the question should be structured in a way that allows for investigation and testing to reach a valid conclusion.
What conclusion can you draw by examining this evidence?
To draw a conclusion from the evidence, one must analyze the data's patterns, correlations, and implications. If the evidence consistently supports a specific hypothesis or trend, it suggests a strong relationship or causation. Conversely, if the evidence shows contradictions or lacks clear support, it may indicate that further investigation is necessary. Ultimately, the conclusion should reflect the weight and reliability of the evidence presented.
Why would the conclusion to a research essay be debatable?
It is based on data that must be interpreted.
What is an argument and what types of statements does it contain?
An argument is a set of statements where some statements, called premises, are offered as reasons to support another statement, known as the conclusion. The premises provide evidence or justification for accepting the conclusion as true or valid. Arguments can be either deductive, where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises, or inductive, where the conclusion is likely based on the premises. Overall, an effective argument must have clear premises and a logically sound conclusion.
How long can evidence be held before it used?
The length of time evidence can be held before it is used varies depending on jurisdiction and the type of case. Generally, law enforcement agencies must adhere to specific guidelines and legal standards, which may dictate how long evidence can be retained, often ranging from a few months to several years. In some cases, evidence must be preserved until the conclusion of a trial or any related appeals. Ultimately, each jurisdiction has its own rules governing the retention and use of evidence.
What must be true of a conclusion of a controlled experiment?
The conclusion of a controlled experiment must be based on the results obtained from the experiment itself. It should directly address the research question or hypothesis posed at the beginning of the experiment. The conclusion should also highlight any patterns, trends, or relationships observed in the data collected during the experiment.
What are deductive arguments based on?
Deductive arguments are based on logical reasoning, where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This form of reasoning aims to demonstrate the validity of the conclusion through the structure of the argument.
What are the parts of a deductive argument?
A deductive argument consists of a premise (a statement assumed to be true) and a conclusion (a statement inferred from the premises). The premise provides evidence or reasons to support the conclusion, which must necessarily follow from the premises if they are true. Deductive arguments aim to demonstrate the logical necessity of the conclusion based on the premises provided.
What do you think must be done if the conclusion does not support a hypothesis?
When you draw picture than you will need to repeat several times
What is a deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.
