answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do the learning theory and nativist perspective on language development differ?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the nativist view of language acquisition?

The Nativist view of language acquisition is that it is innate. Language learning is not something that a child does, it is something that happens to a child placed in an appropriate environment.


What is nativist theory?

The nativist theory deals with the biological belief that language is an innate feature of the infant. The nativist theory is where it is believed that we have an inborn ability to learn and learning is in our genetics.


What the two methods of Language Acquisition?

The two main methods of language acquisition are innate language acquisition, which is language development that occurs naturally through interactions with caregivers, and formal language acquisition, which involves deliberate instruction and learning in a structured setting like a classroom. Both methods play important roles in the development of language skills.


The language acquisition theory that proposes the existence of a critical period for learning speech is the?

nativist view.


What is nativist perspective theroies?

Nativist perspective theories propose that certain capabilities and characteristics are innate or hard-wired in humans from birth. These theories suggest that genetics play a significant role in shaping cognitive development and behavior. Examples include Noam Chomsky's theory of universal grammar and the idea that certain cognitive functions, like language acquisition, are pre-programmed in the brain.


What are the theories of language development?

There are several theories of language development, including behaviorist theories that emphasize reinforcement and imitation, nativist theories that propose an innate capacity for language acquisition, interactionist theories that highlight social interactions and environmental influences, and cognitive theories that focus on how language and thought are interconnected. Each theory offers a different perspective on how children learn and develop language skills.


Critically evaluate different theories of language development?

There are various theories of language development, including behaviorist (Skinner), nativist (Chomsky), and interactionist (Vygotsky). Behaviorist theory emphasizes the role of reinforcement and conditioning in learning language, whereas nativist theory posits that innate biological mechanisms drive language acquisition. Interactionist theory suggests that both nature and nurture play a role in language development, with social interaction and cognitive processes influencing language acquisition. Each theory offers valuable insights into how language develops, but a holistic view that combines aspects of each may provide a more comprehensive understanding.


Children learn language very quickly based on relatively limited time spent interacting with adults This is taken as support for the nativist view of language development and is called the?

This phenomenon is called the "critical period" theory, which suggests that there is a unique window of time during early childhood when language acquisition is especially rapid and successful. The nativist view posits that humans are born with an innate capacity for language learning, which is why children are able to learn language so quickly and effortlessly.


What is the nativist theory?

The nativist theory is where it is believed that we have an inborn ability to learn and learning is in our genetics. Therefore who we are today is because we're born like that because of our biologiocal history. Chomsky has done many reseach on this and has the greatest influence on this theory.


What is nativist view of language acqisition?

The nativist view proposes that humans are born with innate biological abilities that facilitate language acquisition. This perspective suggests that the human brain is pre-wired to acquire language and that universal grammar principles guide language development. Proponents of this view, such as Noam Chomsky, argue that environmental input alone is insufficient to account for the complex nature of language acquisition, highlighting the role of genetic predispositions.


While it offers compelling explanations for language development the most significant shortcoming nativist account is?

many of its claims are difficult to falsify


Children learn language very quickly based on relatively limited time spent interacting with adults. This is taken as support for the nativist view of language development and is called the?

poverty of stimulus argument.