Stanley Milgram's experiment investigated the effect of authority on people's willingness to do unethical things, stemming from the experiences of the Holocaust. I think his hypothesis was that if people are pressured by a person of authority to do something, they will do it, even if it is against their moral code.
It depends a great deal on the specific experiment. But in general, you start with a hypothesis (a proposed idea) and use the experiment to either confirm or contradict your hypothesis. Having a well-stated and clear hypothesis is critical to having a good experiment. Alternatively, you can use an experiment to answer a specific question. Once you have a hypothesis or question to address, you need to establish a method by which you will answer the question. It is important to not only consider the technique itself and how to do it, but also how to interpret different possible results. Once you have performed the experiment, you must interpret your results (usually using the interpretation mentioned above). You must also consider other factors in your results, such as error (either random or systematic). Finally, do the results support or contradict the original hypothesis, or do they answer the question originally asked? If not, what is missing? If so, what does that mean (in other words, why was the hypothesis interesting or important to test in the first place?
Scientists use hypothesis to make predictions about the outcome of an experiment based on prior knowledge or observations. For example, a hypothesis may state that "If plants receive more sunlight, then they will grow taller."
The purpose is why you are doing the experiment. What do you want to fond out?? The hypothesis is your prediction on the outcome of the experiment. It is usually written in an If...Then...Because form
In the scientific method, the experiment is a controlled procedure designed to test a hypothesis by collecting data. It involves manipulating one variable while keeping others constant to observe the effects and draw conclusions. The results of the experiment help determine the validity of the hypothesis.
Milgram's experiment was a psychological study conducted in the 1960s that tested obedience to authority figures. Participants were instructed to administer electric shocks to another person, who they believed was receiving real shocks, when they answered questions incorrectly. The study revealed the extent to which people are willing to obey authority figures, even if it involves harming others.
You act and experiment according to your hypothesis and write observations.
Think about the aim of the experiment. Relate the hypothesis to this. A hypothesis is an educated guess of what you think will happen in the experiment. For example, if you're doing an experiment on the quality of different fertilizers, choose which fertilizer you think will be most effective and state this as your hypothesis.
To write a hypothesis for a scientific experiment, clearly state the relationship between the variables being studied and make a prediction about the outcome. Be specific, testable, and based on existing knowledge or observations.
your answerWell what you have to know FIRST is what they do BEFORE the experiment. What scientist do before an experiment is they observe what they are going to do. Then they come up with an HYPOTHESIS. An HYPOTHESIS is an educated guess. They write what they THINK is going to happen. Then they do their experiment. After they do that, they check their HYPOTHESISand if they guessed wrong, they don't cross the HYPOTHESISout, they learn from their mistakes, so they write what really happened during the experiment. I hope this helped if it did then email me at babybaby12123@yahoo.com
A hypothesis is tested by an experiment. A hypothesis is an estimate or guess about an outcome. The experiment proves whether the hypothesis is correct or not correct.
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
By conducting your experiment, the result of that experiment either agrees with your hypothesis or disagrees your hypothesis.
You first have to come up with a hypothesis. Review the relevant work already completed out there. Design an experiment around to test your hypothesis. Conduct the experiment and analyze the results. Write a summary report. Using the data from the experiment to evaluate the hypothesis in order to draw a valid conclusions.
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
You write an if-then statement to represent what you think will happen at the end of your experiment. For example, let's say someone did an experiment on if chemicals effect plant growth. The hypothesis would be, "If chemicals contain unnatural substances that are un-earth friendly, then they will effect plant growth."
test your hypothesis.
A hypothesis for an experiment involving dry ice could be: "I predict that placing dry ice in warm water will cause it to rapidly sublimate, creating a cloud of carbon dioxide gas due to the temperature difference between the dry ice and water." This hypothesis clearly states the expected outcome of the experiment and the reason behind it.