0
How might the Stanford prison experiment have shown in-group bias out-group homogeneity and out-group derogation Describe what each is and then give an example from the experiment?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
In-group bias is when individuals favor people within their own group over those outside of it. Out-group homogeneity is the tendency to see members of out-groups as more similar or alike each other than members of in-groups. Out-group derogation involves holding negative views or attitudes towards members of an out-group.
The Stanford prison experiment may have shown in-group bias through the guards displaying favoritism towards their fellow guards, while mistreating the prisoners. Out-group homogeneity may be demonstrated by the guards perceiving the prisoners as a monolithic group of disobedient or troublemaking individuals. Out-group derogation could be observed in the guards using dehumanizing tactics and derogatory language towards the prisoners based on their group membership.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who ran the Stanford Prison Experiment?
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971 at Stanford University.
What was Zimbardo's role in the Stanford prison experiment?
Philip Zimbardo was the lead researcher in the Stanford prison experiment, which he designed and supervised. He played a significant role in shaping the study's methodology and overseeing its implementation.
How might the Stanford prison experiment have shown in-group bias?
The Stanford prison experiment demonstrated in-group bias by showing how participants assigned the role of guards quickly identified with their group and exhibited prejudice and discrimination towards the "prisoner" group. This bias led to dehumanization and mistreatment of the prisoners, showcasing the power of group dynamics in influencing behavior.
Was is ethical to do this study of the Stanford experiment?
The Stanford Prison Experiment has raised ethical concerns due to the psychological harm experienced by participants. The study lacked proper informed consent and debriefing procedures, which are essential ethical standards in research involving human subjects. Additionally, the power dynamics established in the study were not adequately monitored, leading to the mistreatment of participants.
What are confounding variables in Stanford prison experiment?
Confounding variables in the Stanford prison experiment could include the psychological characteristics of the participants, such as pre-existing attitudes towards authority or aggression. Additionally, the specific conditions in which the experiment took place, such as the lack of oversight and the power dynamics between the guards and prisoners, could also be considered confounding variables that influenced the outcomes of the study.
A research project in which some students acted as prisoners and some acted as guards was called .?
the Stanford prison experiment
In Zimbardo's classic Stanford prison experiment participants succumbed to the power of?
In Zimbardo's classic Stanford prison experiment, participants succumbed to the power of
Who ran the Stanford Prison Experiment?
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971 at Stanford University.
What was Zimbardo's role in the Stanford prison experiment?
Philip Zimbardo was the lead researcher in the Stanford prison experiment, which he designed and supervised. He played a significant role in shaping the study's methodology and overseeing its implementation.
What did the Stanford prison experiment showed?
Power makes some people cruel.
What generalization is suggested by the Milgram experiment and the Stanford University prison experiment?
many people will uncritically follow the commands of those in authority.
What research method was used in Philip zimbardos study Stanford county prison?
the experiment
What research method was used in Philip Zimbardos study the Stanford County Prison?
the experiment
What was the Stanford prison experiment showed that?
The Stanford prison experiment showed how situational factors, such as the role people are assigned, can greatly influence human behavior. It demonstrated the power of social roles and the potential for individuals to exhibit abusive behavior when placed in positions of authority. Additionally, it highlighted the importance of ethical considerations in psychological research.
Was it ethical to do the Stanford prison experiment?
The Stanford prison experiment had been conducted from August 14 to August 20 and was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. 24 male students were selected with roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison.
What are confounding variables in Stanford prison experiment?
Confounding variables in the Stanford prison experiment could include the psychological characteristics of the participants, such as pre-existing attitudes towards authority or aggression. Additionally, the specific conditions in which the experiment took place, such as the lack of oversight and the power dynamics between the guards and prisoners, could also be considered confounding variables that influenced the outcomes of the study.
What was the name of the research project in which some students act as prisoners and some acted as guards?
the stanford prison experiment.
