0
How might the Stanford prison experiment have shown in-group bias?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
The Stanford prison experiment demonstrated in-group bias by showing how participants assigned the role of guards quickly identified with their group and exhibited prejudice and discrimination towards the "prisoner" group. This bias led to dehumanization and mistreatment of the prisoners, showcasing the power of group dynamics in influencing behavior.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How might the Stanford prison experiment have shown in-group bias out-group homogeneity and out-group derogation Describe what each is and then give an example from the experiment?
In-group bias is when individuals favor people within their own group over those outside of it. Out-group homogeneity is the tendency to see members of out-groups as more similar or alike each other than members of in-groups. Out-group derogation involves holding negative views or attitudes towards members of an out-group. The Stanford prison experiment may have shown in-group bias through the guards displaying favoritism towards their fellow guards, while mistreating the prisoners. Out-group homogeneity may be demonstrated by the guards perceiving the prisoners as a monolithic group of disobedient or troublemaking individuals. Out-group derogation could be observed in the guards using dehumanizing tactics and derogatory language towards the prisoners based on their group membership.
Give some examples of case studies on human behavior?
The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Zimbardo in 1971 demonstrated the powerful influence of situational factors on behavior, as participants took on the roles of guards and prisoners and exhibited extreme behaviors. The Milgram Experiment conducted by Milgram in 1961 showed the obedience of individuals to authority figures, even when it meant delivering potentially harmful electric shocks to others. The Little Albert Experiment by Watson and Rayner in 1920 demonstrated conditioning principles by conditioning a young child to fear a white rat through association with a loud noise.
How might the prisoners in the zimbardo experiment have used fundamental attribution error when they were participating in the study?
The prisoners in the Zimbardo experiment may have used fundamental attribution error by attributing their negative behaviors or emotions to external factors, such as the oppressive prison environment or the actions of the guards, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions. This could have led them to believe that their behavior was a result of the situation they were in, rather than reflecting their own internal traits.
An experiment finds that teens who play video games have increased critical thinking skills. What might have been the hypothesis for this experiment?
The hypothesis for this experiment could have been "Playing video games is associated with improved critical thinking skills in teenagers." The researchers likely predicted that there would be a positive relationship between the hours spent playing video games and the level of critical thinking skills demonstrated by the participants.
What does 'when anger rises think of consequences mean?
This phrase emphasizes the importance of taking a moment to consider the potential outcomes before reacting in anger. It reminds us to reflect on how our actions might impact ourselves and others before letting our emotions take over. By thinking about the consequences, we can make more rational decisions and avoid causing harm or making regrets.
What might be the dependent variable in Shannon lucids experiment?
What might be the dependent variable in Shannon lucid's experiment
Where might one find listings for jobs available at Stanford Hospital?
To find information on jobs available at Stanford Hospital, go to the Stanford Hospital Careers website. From there, you can search available jobs as well as find information for the application, hiring and relocation processes.
Two reason why an experiment might not support a hypothesis even when the hypothesis is correct?
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
Where does Itch hide his experiment from his mum?
It might be the shed
What the independent variable in an experiment might change?
variable
Is there public transport to Addiewell prison from Airdrie?
If you are planning to visit someone in Addiewell Prison it might be simplest to phone the prison and ask about public transport.
What is something you might see in a prison cell?
bed
Why is it importat in organize data in an iquiry?
An Inquiry is an investigation of an experiment, so if you didn't, the results in the experiment might be incorrect.
What is the difference between a science experiment and a science activity?
An experiment is where you try something. And an activity might be just for fun.
What do you call a factor that confuses the result of an experiment?
If there is a factor that confuses the result of an experiment, I would call that a design flaw in the experiment. It might also be an uncontrolled variable.
What might you ask yourself and drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
You might ask yourself what did I learn from this test and how
How might you test your hypothesis?
It's simple construct an experiment!
