The prisoners in the Zimbardo experiment may have used fundamental attribution error by attributing their negative behaviors or emotions to external factors, such as the oppressive prison environment or the actions of the guards, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions. This could have led them to believe that their behavior was a result of the situation they were in, rather than reflecting their own internal traits.
In-group bias is when individuals favor people within their own group over those outside of it. Out-group homogeneity is the tendency to see members of out-groups as more similar or alike each other than members of in-groups. Out-group derogation involves holding negative views or attitudes towards members of an out-group. The Stanford prison experiment may have shown in-group bias through the guards displaying favoritism towards their fellow guards, while mistreating the prisoners. Out-group homogeneity may be demonstrated by the guards perceiving the prisoners as a monolithic group of disobedient or troublemaking individuals. Out-group derogation could be observed in the guards using dehumanizing tactics and derogatory language towards the prisoners based on their group membership.
The Stanford prison experiment demonstrated in-group bias by showing how participants assigned the role of guards quickly identified with their group and exhibited prejudice and discrimination towards the "prisoner" group. This bias led to dehumanization and mistreatment of the prisoners, showcasing the power of group dynamics in influencing behavior.
Confounding variables in the Stanford prison experiment could include the psychological characteristics of the participants, such as pre-existing attitudes towards authority or aggression. Additionally, the specific conditions in which the experiment took place, such as the lack of oversight and the power dynamics between the guards and prisoners, could also be considered confounding variables that influenced the outcomes of the study.
The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Zimbardo in 1971 demonstrated the powerful influence of situational factors on behavior, as participants took on the roles of guards and prisoners and exhibited extreme behaviors. The Milgram Experiment conducted by Milgram in 1961 showed the obedience of individuals to authority figures, even when it meant delivering potentially harmful electric shocks to others. The Little Albert Experiment by Watson and Rayner in 1920 demonstrated conditioning principles by conditioning a young child to fear a white rat through association with a loud noise.
The Nazis forced some prisoners to wear a second badge underneath their primary identification badge to denote additional forms of persecution or discrimination, such as being a political prisoner, homosexual, or a repeat offender. This practice aimed to further dehumanize and isolate certain groups of prisoners within the concentration camps.
They felt as if they were truly prisoners (Apex)
the Stanford prison experiment
The scientific term that could describe the group of prisoners who changed their diet in Goldberger's experiment is the "experimental group." This group would be compared to a control group to determine the effects of the changed diet.
the stanford prison experiment.
The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most famous experiments in psychology's history, conducted in 1971 by a team of researchers led by Stanford University psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The experiment was a study of the psychological effects of becoming either a prisoner or prison guard. Randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards were assigned to student volunteers in a mock prison situation. The participants adapted to their roles well beyond Zimbardo's expectations, as the guards enforced authoritarian measures and ultimately subjected some of the prisoners to psychological torture, while many of the prisoners passively accepted the abuse and, at the request of the guards, even harassed other prisoners. The experiment affected Zimbardo himself, who, in his role as the superintendent, permitted the abuse to continue. Two of the prisoners quit the experiment early and the entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six days. The results of the experiment have been presented to illustrate the impressionability and obedience of people when placed within a situation of presumed institutional authority and socially legitimized stereotypes.
The Stanford prison experiment had been conducted from August 14 to August 20 and was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. 24 male students were selected with roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison.
The collective nouns for prisoners are a pityof prisoners, a gang of prisoners.
prisoners rights are rights given to prisoners by the government.
The students acting as prisoners were showing signs of extreme distress.
Military prisoners
there were 1000 prisoners and cells
Prisoners at Flossenburg wore what prisoners in other concentration camps wore; striped uniforms.