0
How might the prisoners in the zimbardo experiment have used fundamental attribution error when they were participating in the study?
The prisoners in the Zimbardo experiment may have used fundamental attribution error by attributing their negative behaviors or emotions to external factors, such as the oppressive prison environment or the actions of the guards, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions. This could have led them to believe that their behavior was a result of the situation they were in, rather than reflecting their own internal traits.
What else can I help you with?
How might the Stanford prison experiment have shown in-group bias out-group homogeneity and out-group derogation Describe what each is and then give an example from the experiment?
In-group bias is when individuals favor people within their own group over those outside of it. Out-group homogeneity is the tendency to see members of out-groups as more similar or alike each other than members of in-groups. Out-group derogation involves holding negative views or attitudes towards members of an out-group. The Stanford prison experiment may have shown in-group bias through the guards displaying favoritism towards their fellow guards, while mistreating the prisoners. Out-group homogeneity may be demonstrated by the guards perceiving the prisoners as a monolithic group of disobedient or troublemaking individuals. Out-group derogation could be observed in the guards using dehumanizing tactics and derogatory language towards the prisoners based on their group membership.
How might the Stanford prison experiment have shown in-group bias?
The Stanford prison experiment demonstrated in-group bias by showing how participants assigned the role of guards quickly identified with their group and exhibited prejudice and discrimination towards the "prisoner" group. This bias led to dehumanization and mistreatment of the prisoners, showcasing the power of group dynamics in influencing behavior.
What are confounding variables in Stanford prison experiment?
Confounding variables in the Stanford prison experiment could include the psychological characteristics of the participants, such as pre-existing attitudes towards authority or aggression. Additionally, the specific conditions in which the experiment took place, such as the lack of oversight and the power dynamics between the guards and prisoners, could also be considered confounding variables that influenced the outcomes of the study.
Give some examples of case studies on human behavior?
The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Zimbardo in 1971 demonstrated the powerful influence of situational factors on behavior, as participants took on the roles of guards and prisoners and exhibited extreme behaviors. The Milgram Experiment conducted by Milgram in 1961 showed the obedience of individuals to authority figures, even when it meant delivering potentially harmful electric shocks to others. The Little Albert Experiment by Watson and Rayner in 1920 demonstrated conditioning principles by conditioning a young child to fear a white rat through association with a loud noise.
Why did the Nazis force some prisoners to wear a second badge underneath?
The Nazis forced some prisoners to wear a second badge underneath their primary identification badge to denote additional forms of persecution or discrimination, such as being a political prisoner, homosexual, or a repeat offender. This practice aimed to further dehumanize and isolate certain groups of prisoners within the concentration camps.
What happened to those assigned as prisoners in the Stanford prison experiment?
They felt as if they were truly prisoners (Apex)
A research project in which some students acted as prisoners and some acted as guards was called .?
the Stanford prison experiment
What scientific term could describe the group of prisoners who changed their diet in gold Berger's experiment?
The scientific term that could describe the group of prisoners who changed their diet in Goldberger's experiment is the "experimental group." This group would be compared to a control group to determine the effects of the changed diet.
What was the name of the research project in which some students act as prisoners and some acted as guards?
the stanford prison experiment.
What was the Stanford prison expirament?
The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most famous experiments in psychology's history, conducted in 1971 by a team of researchers led by Stanford University psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The experiment was a study of the psychological effects of becoming either a prisoner or prison guard. Randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards were assigned to student volunteers in a mock prison situation. The participants adapted to their roles well beyond Zimbardo's expectations, as the guards enforced authoritarian measures and ultimately subjected some of the prisoners to psychological torture, while many of the prisoners passively accepted the abuse and, at the request of the guards, even harassed other prisoners. The experiment affected Zimbardo himself, who, in his role as the superintendent, permitted the abuse to continue. Two of the prisoners quit the experiment early and the entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six days. The results of the experiment have been presented to illustrate the impressionability and obedience of people when placed within a situation of presumed institutional authority and socially legitimized stereotypes.
6 What factors would lead prisoners to attribute guard brutality to the guards' disposition or character rather than to the situation?
Prisoners might attribute guard brutality to the guards' disposition or character due to personal experiences that reinforce negative stereotypes about authority figures, leading to a belief that such behavior is inherent. Additionally, the dehumanizing environment of the prison can exacerbate feelings of helplessness and a desire to find a clear cause for their suffering, making it easier to target the guards as individuals. Cognitive biases, such as the fundamental attribution error, also play a role, as individuals tend to overemphasize personal traits while downplaying situational factors that influence behavior.
Was it ethical to do the Stanford prison experiment?
The Stanford prison experiment had been conducted from August 14 to August 20 and was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. 24 male students were selected with roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison.
In the Stanford prison experiment?
The Stanford prison experiment, conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971, aimed to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power and authority in a simulated prison environment. College students were assigned roles as either guards or prisoners, quickly leading to abusive behaviors from the guards and emotional distress among the prisoners. The experiment was intended to last two weeks but was terminated after just six days due to the extreme psychological impact on participants. This study highlighted the power of situational factors and authority in shaping human behavior.
What is a collective noun for prisoners?
The collective nouns for prisoners are a pityof prisoners, a gang of prisoners.
What caused researchers to stop the Stanford prison experiment after only six days?
The students acting as prisoners were showing signs of extreme distress.
What rights do prisoners have Scotland?
prisoners rights are rights given to prisoners by the government.
What kind of prisoners did alcatraz have at first?
Military prisoners
