Conditioning is still practiced today. For example, operant conditioning, which includes the use of reinforcement to increase the probability of apparition of behaviour, is commonly used in day to day life. A good example for this are fidelity cards or membership cards that give you points or some sort of credit to be later used when you buy in certain stores. Those are made to increase the probability of you spending there. Positive reinforcement is also used in different types of settings and of interventions, such as in psychiatric hospitals, with children with behavioral problems, etc.
classical conditioning is where a participant learns to associate a stimulus with food that doesn't result in an overt behavioral response whereas operant is where a participant learns by reinforcement of consequences of a behaviour.
Yes, many of the fundamental principles and theories that psychology was built upon still hold true today. For example, concepts like classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and cognitive processes are still widely used and accepted in the field of psychology. However, there have also been advancements and new theories developed to better understand human behavior and cognition.
Ivan Pavlov's research on classical conditioning laid the foundation for understanding how learned associations influence behavior. This concept is still relevant in modern psychology and has influenced various areas such as education, therapy, and advertising. The principles of classical conditioning continue to be applied in areas like behavior modification and understanding psychological disorders.
Behaviorist perspective believes in directly observable behavior and strongly focuses on how the environment and reinforcer (reward and punishment) have an impact on peoples behavior. Humanistic perspective believe that we should focus on our conscious experiences and strongly believe in human reaching their full potential. Humanistic tend to disagree with behaviorist as far as the manner goes of studying observable behavior and Humanistic perspective believes even if it can not be directly observed it should still be focused on.
There are two types of conditioning covered in Psychology 101. Are you *sure* that you don't mean *Operant*Conditioning? Operant and Classical conditioning were and continue to be fundamental principles in the field of psychology. There is such a thing as Observational Learning, but the act of learning is different from being *conditioned*. I hope these definitions help you:Operant Conditioning: Operant Conditioning can be boiled down to two fundamental principles: positive and negative reinforcement. B.F. Skinnerdetermined that an organism will complete a task/challenge/feat in order to gain a reward (positive) from the parent/teacher/etc. and avoid punishment or an undesirable outcome/behavior (negative).There are examples of operant conditioning at work all around us. Think about the case of children completing homework to earn a reward from a parent or teacher, or working hard at your job to finish projects so that your boss will give you praise or a promotion.In the examples above, the promise of a reward increases the desired behavior, but operant conditioning can also be used to decrease or prevent a behavior. An undesirable outcome or punishment can be used to motivate a being to *stop* displaying a certain behavior. For example, if a child is told that s/he will be grounded for the weekend if their chores are not completed, the potential for punishment or an undesirable outcome will prompt the child to follow through with their chores.(If this answer is not satisfactory, find more at: http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/introopcond.htm)Classical Conditioning: Classical Conditioning can also be boiled down to a very few specific key points; in this case, four (notice they come in pairs!): Unconditioned Stimulus(UCS), Unconditioned Response (UCR), Conditioned Stimulus (CS), Conditioned Response(CR).-UCS is any event that happens to us that naturally triggers a response (ex: the smell of your favorite food).-UCR is any response that we have naturally to an UCS (getting hungry (response) when we smell our favorite food (stimulus))-CS: Any formally neutral or non-response causing event that, through association, causes us to have a response (example below).-CR: Any response that we have learned through interaction with a previously neutral stimulus (example below)Ivan Pavlov believed that we learn through interaction with our environment and those things that are naturallyoccurring (sounds, smells, tastes, touches, ect). The fact that human beings and other creatures have responses to their environment or when good/bad things happen is common sense -- but Pavlov wanted to take it farther than that. He wanted to train an organism to have a specific response to an event/stimulus. Ivan Pavlov used his dogs to help him develop his theory. I will explain the way he came to his conclusions and also apply the above four key terms in the example.Pavlov noticed that when his the dogs saw their food bowls coming towards them (UCS) they would begin to drool/salivate (UCR). He decided to train them to salivate when a different stimulus/event happened, but he would first have to pair them together (or associate them). Pavlov started to ring a bell every time he would bring the dogs their food. In the beginning the dogs would still salivate only when the bowls were brought to them. But over time, the dogs began to associate the sound of the bell ringing with the food being brought to them. After much training, Pavlov was able to simply ring the bell (CS) and the dogs would begin drooling without food even being brought to them (CR). Pavlov had successfully trained his dogs to have a conditioned response (salivating) to a conditioned stimulus (bell ringing) simply by association of food and sound.Observational Learning: Observational Learning "is a type of learning in which a person learns new information and behaviors by observing the behaviors of others" (http://www.psychologyandsociety.com/observationlearning.html). Albert Bandura established Social Learning Theory, of which Observational Learning is a component.
classical conditioning is where a participant learns to associate a stimulus with food that doesn't result in an overt behavioral response whereas operant is where a participant learns by reinforcement of consequences of a behaviour.
Yes, many of the fundamental principles and theories that psychology was built upon still hold true today. For example, concepts like classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and cognitive processes are still widely used and accepted in the field of psychology. However, there have also been advancements and new theories developed to better understand human behavior and cognition.
Yes, ballet is still practiced today.
yes, book burning is still practiced today
Ivan Pavlov's research on classical conditioning laid the foundation for understanding how learned associations influence behavior. This concept is still relevant in modern psychology and has influenced various areas such as education, therapy, and advertising. The principles of classical conditioning continue to be applied in areas like behavior modification and understanding psychological disorders.
Traditional Kabuki plays are still performed in Japan. Classical performance of Noh is still practiced mainly in Tokyo, Osaka and Kyoto. The classic comedic theatre of Kyogen can also be found in Tokyo. Ikebana or Japanese flower arranging is still widely practiced. Sado, the Japanese Tea Ceremony is both taught and enjoyed at venues throughout Tokyo.
church
Yes, polygamy is still practiced in the United States by some groups of people, but not with legal consent.
'&&' is used for short-circuiting boolean expressions, which means that it will stop evaluating if the first operant is false but '&' won't. This can be easier understood with an example: int i = 0; if( i < 10 && i++ < 20) { //some fancy stuff in here } first operant: i < 5 second operant: i++ < 20 In this case (using '&&'), if the first operant is evaluated to be false, it will stop and does not continue to evaluate the second operant. If '&&' was replaced by '&,' even if the first operation is evaluated as false. It will still continue to evaluate the second operant before evaluating that the whole boolean is false, thus taking more time.
Although segregation was illegal, it was still practiced. Northern cities went by custom not by laws.
yes.
yes