answersLogoWhite

0

This is a fascinating question. Looking at his methods to do civil disobedience,

I would say that the main characteristic of them is turning the aggression of the British colonial power on itself.

He was a master at producing the effect of showing sheer, brute military force against a defenseless populace. The "prophet in rags" was able to show the restraining forces of police and military fighting against a non-enemy, the local peasants, without no weapons whatsoever.

This peaceful methods of non-violent resistance are indeed not using violence; what is surprising is that even not having one aggressive action, they are able to destroy military discipline and morale.

What is the fun of going to war if the enemy doesn't react? when there is absolutely no violent response, the use of force begins to be experienced as ridiculous, unnecessary and unjust.

This is what did the Brits in: to be seen as massacring unarmed civilians and thus depicted as sanguinary, cruel and stupidly violent destroyed troops' morale and forced them to drop their arms.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Psychology

How does General Smuts relate to Gandhi?

Jan Smuts was the president of South Africa when Ghandi organized South Asian workers to protest poor working conditions. The resulting strikes and uprisings were forcefully put down by the Smuts administration, which resulted in international condemnation. Contrary to the previous answer to this question, there were not millions of Hindu killed. Unfortunately there were some killed during the crackdown, but those numbered 20 some dead, not millions.


Who are some people who have done good things for others?

Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malala Yousafzai are some notable individuals who have made significant positive impacts on the lives of others through their humanitarian efforts and activism.


Who is the most influential literal person in modern history?

It is difficult to pinpoint one single most influential person in modern history, as there have been many individuals who have made significant impacts. Some commonly cited figures include Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, and Albert Einstein. Each of these individuals has had a profound influence on the world in different ways.


Difference between habits and character?

Habit is similar to public "Burping". Some societies like it (as a symbol of being well fed or having enjoyed their meal as guests) and others call is "Gross" (as in bad mannered). No one is wrong. Character is similar to being "Mahatma Gandhi" or being "Hitler". Mahatma Gandhi burped and not the best dressed individual, but was a globally accepted highest character individual that mankind has seen. Hitler was well dressed/perhaps well mannered army general, and perhaps did not burp in public but was the worst character mankind has ever seen! Hope this gives you the pointers to exactly understand the difference :)


Who are some great politicians that are responsible for global peace?

Some great politicians known for their role in promoting global peace include Nelson Mandela, who worked tirelessly to end apartheid in South Africa, and won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. Another notable figure is Mahatma Gandhi, whose nonviolent resistance played a significant role in India's independence movement and inspired peaceful movements around the world. Additionally, current leaders like Angela Merkel, who has been a key player in fostering unity and stability in Europe, and Ban Ki-moon, former Secretary-General of the United Nations, have also made significant contributions to global peace.

Related Questions