the pros are that it is easier to categorize people/countries/races. this can be a lot easier when arranging activities. such as, you wouldn't set up a science trivia game for children who get little education. the cons are that people can treat the stereotyped people exactly as they are stereotyped, prohibiting the individuality of each person.
pros- you get to help people get rid of their negative ways? cons- you dont get paid as much as psychiatrists.
you feel good cons u are more guliable
Pros: Provides descriptive data about behavior presumably uncontaminated by outside influences Cons: Observer bias and participant self-consciousness can distort results.
The pros and cons of nature versus nurture are quite varied. Disagreement is perhaps the biggest con, or debate. Some researchers think inherited traits are in the genes, while others think that traits are inherently learned.
The long and short of it is...all racism is stereotyping but not all stereotyping is racism.
pros and cons of physiocrats
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros: goodness cons: badness
pros are + and cons are-
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.
Cons? What Cons?
what are the pros and cons of being an architect
What are the pros and cons of transformational leadership?
pros: Unity and cohesion Cons: Corruption
pros= nothing cons=everything
Usually there are no pros or cons.