0
The concept of tabula rasa, which suggests that individuals are born as a blank slate and are shaped primarily by their environment and experiences, supports nurture over nature. This concept highlights the impact of socialization, education, and environmental factors in shaping an individual's behavior and development.
What else can I help you with?
Is this true Humans have more control over their own destinies if they are the product of nature rather than nurture?
It is not accurate to make a blanket statement that humans have more control over their destinies based on being a product of nature rather than nurture. Both nature and nurture influence human development and behavior, and individuals have varying degrees of control over their destinies regardless of these factors. Additionally, the interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can differ from person to person.
Arguments as to whether psychological differences between men and women result from biological or social influences most clearly involve a debate over the issue of?
nature versus nurture. Nature refers to biological factors such as genetics and hormones, while nurture encompasses environmental and social influences. The debate centers on the relative importance of these factors in shaping psychological differences between men and women.
Psychologists often talk of the nature-nurture controversy. What concepts support the nurture over the nature part?
Concepts that support the nurture aspect include environmental influences such as upbringing, social interactions, education, and life experiences that shape an individual's behaviors and traits. The idea is that these external factors have a significant impact on an individual's psychological development and overall personality.
What does the Flynn effect say about nature nurture and intelligence?
The Flynn effect suggests that intelligence can change over time, indicating that both nature (genetics) and nurture (environmental factors) play a role in shaping intelligence. It highlights the complexity of intelligence and the need to consider a combination of both genetic and environmental influences in understanding cognitive abilities.
What is Rousseau view on nature vs nurture?
Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that humans are naturally good and that society corrupts them. He argued that individuals are born with an innate sense of compassion and virtue, but that society and its institutions lead to the development of negative traits. Rousseau emphasized the importance of nature over nurture in shaping a person's character and moral values.
In the context of debates over the origins of knowledge nature is to nurture as is to?
In the context of debates over the origins of knowledge, nature is to nurture as innate is to learned. The question revolves around whether knowledge is primarily determined by our genetic makeup (nature) or shaped through our environment and experiences (nurture).
Is this true Humans have more control over their own destinies if they are the product of nature rather than nurture?
It is not accurate to make a blanket statement that humans have more control over their destinies based on being a product of nature rather than nurture. Both nature and nurture influence human development and behavior, and individuals have varying degrees of control over their destinies regardless of these factors. Additionally, the interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can differ from person to person.
In the context of debates over the origins of knowledge nature is to nurture as?
In the context of debates over the origins of knowledge, nature is to nurture as genetics is to environment. Nature refers to innate characteristics or genetics, while nurture refers to external influences or environment shaping one's knowledge or behavior. The debate often revolves around the extent to which genetic predispositions versus environmental factors contribute to the development of knowledge and abilities.
What is the opposite of nurture?
The direct opposite of nurture would be to deprive or oppress. The condition that is opposite is the lack of nurturing, which is to neglect or ignore.In debates over human behavior, the opposite influence to nurture is "nature" (nature vs nurture), natural behavior being instinctive rather than learned.
Arguments as to whether psychological differences between men and women result from biological or social influences most clearly involve a debate over the issue of?
nature versus nurture. Nature refers to biological factors such as genetics and hormones, while nurture encompasses environmental and social influences. The debate centers on the relative importance of these factors in shaping psychological differences between men and women.
What is emerson's concept of the oversoul?
Emerson's concept of the over-soul is the bridge, or the unifier, that connects man, nature, and God
Does Mary Shelley side on nurture over nature in Frankenstein?
Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein presents a complex exploration of the influences of both nature and nurture. While the creature's experiences highlight the importance of nurture in shaping behavior, the novel also suggests that inherent traits and impulses play a role in determining one's actions. Ultimately, Shelley emphasizes the significance of both nature and nurture in shaping individual identity and behavior.
Psychologists often talk of the nature-nurture controversy. What concepts support the nurture over the nature part?
Concepts that support the nurture aspect include environmental influences such as upbringing, social interactions, education, and life experiences that shape an individual's behaviors and traits. The idea is that these external factors have a significant impact on an individual's psychological development and overall personality.
What is Nature and nurture controversy about learning?
The controversy of "nature vs. nurture" is basically about behavior and learning. The question is simply this: Do people act in a certain way because of instinct or is it because of how he or she was raised?
What does the Flynn effect say about nature nurture and intelligence?
The Flynn effect suggests that intelligence can change over time, indicating that both nature (genetics) and nurture (environmental factors) play a role in shaping intelligence. It highlights the complexity of intelligence and the need to consider a combination of both genetic and environmental influences in understanding cognitive abilities.
What is Rousseau view on nature vs nurture?
Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that humans are naturally good and that society corrupts them. He argued that individuals are born with an innate sense of compassion and virtue, but that society and its institutions lead to the development of negative traits. Rousseau emphasized the importance of nature over nurture in shaping a person's character and moral values.
Why is John B. Watson considered the father of behaviorism?
He famously said that, if he were given a young child, he could raise the child to turn out as he wished -- nurture over nature.
