Oh, dude, scientists do experiments more than once because they want to make sure their results aren't just a fluke. Like, imagine if they discovered a cure for something, but it only worked once out of a hundred tries - that would be a bummer. So, they repeat experiments to make sure their findings are legit and not just a one-time lucky shot.
Investigating more than once can help to verify the accuracy of the initial findings, ensure all possible angles are explored, and enhance the credibility of the final results. It also helps in identifying any inconsistencies or errors in the previous investigation, leading to a more comprehensive and reliable outcome.
Researchers use experiments because they allow for cause-and-effect relationships to be established between variables. Experiments provide a high level of control over variables, which increases the internal validity of the study. This method helps researchers test hypotheses and make inferences about the relationship between variables.
They found out that he had more folds in his brain, and therefore, he had a bigger and more developed brain than the average person. With more brains folds, he had more brain material than the typical person.
Researchers use experiments to distinguish between cause and effect relationships. This involves manipulating one variable (independent variable) and observing the effect on another variable (dependent variable) in a controlled setting. Experiments allow researchers to make direct inferences about the relationship between variables, which is difficult to achieve with other research methods.
An experiment allows for the researcher to manipulate variables and establish cause-and-effect relationships more effectively than an observational study. This control helps to minimize confounding variables and biases, making the results more reliable. Additionally, experiments often involve random assignment, which enhances the ability to draw conclusions about the relationships being studied.
A Cheater
a repeat.
Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become
replicate
It is called repeated trials.
Quality control and proof of accuracy, to weed out contaminants or bias.
average result is the result when you do a few times of the same experiment and get a few result then you average it.
It is not true that if a scientists fails to find a definite answer to experiments that they are a bad researcher. The problem could be very complicated.
Scientists collect raw data on Antarctica, rather than performing experiments. Experiments are held back for performance in their domestic laboratories, sometimes using the raw data collected on the continent.
Greek philosophers focused on abstract concepts and theories about the nature of reality, ethics, and knowledge, rather than conducting empirical investigations or experiments like scientists do. They were more concerned with understanding the world through logic and reasoning rather than through observation and data collection.
Scientists do their test more than once, or get their colleagues and peers to do the same experiment in order to verify the results of their experiment. This is called reproducing an experiment and its results.
Idk.I guess more men are interested in science than women.