answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Some people consider it to be one because it's unproven and has not submitted to double blind studies.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago

Dianetics is considered a pseudoscience because it lacks empirical evidence to support its claims and its methods have not been scientifically validated. The concepts and practices within Dianetics are not accepted by the scientific community due to their lack of rigorous scientific testing and methodology.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is dianetics a pseudoscience?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology
Related questions

Why is Dianetics not a science?

Why is Dianetics not a science?


When was Dianetics created?

Dianetics was created in 1950.


When was A Doctor's Report on Dianetics created?

A Doctor's Report on Dianetics was created in 1951.


What is the difference in being imaginative in science and in pseudoscience?

science is real and pseudoscience is fake


Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience?

Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience


Which type of science is a pseudoscience?

Science is not pseudoscience. The former is authentic, the latter is fake.


Which physical science is a type of pseudoscience?

Science is not pseudoscience. The former is authentic, the latter is fake.


Church of Scientology scared books and text?

Dianetics


A type of pseudoscience?

Pseudoscience is a belief which is completely scientific and logical but there is no scientific method for it till now.


Why pseudoscience is the polygraph?

Some consider the polygraph a pseudoscience because of the variability of the results of polygraphic testing.


What of these is a type of pseudoscience?

Astrology is a type of pseudoscience which claims to divine information about human affairs and terrestrial events by studying the movements and relative positions of celestial objects. It lacks empirical evidence and scientific validity.


What is different between being imaginative in doing science and doing pseudoscience?

science is real and pseudoscience is fake