Yes, a person riding on a train has a smaller carbon footprint than a person who travels the same distance on car.
Maglev trains do not use gas, so they are good for the environment.
For the speed attained and the people that can be moved, no, old trains are highly inefficient in terms of impact on the environment.
i like trains
What do you mean by safe, for the environment, YES
Trains are better for the environment - as they produce less pollution per passenger than cars do.
they lay their tracks across the countrycoal trains release carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gaselectric trains run on electricity, generally generated by burning coaldiesel trains pollute the air and release carbon dioxidenoise pollution from the engines and the whistling and hooting
maglev trains can help simply because they don't use gas. They use magnets to keep them in the air and moving. Which means they will be better for the ozone layer. They are also much faster than regular trains.
we need trains, because they help us around the world. we can transport it all around the world. Trains are a succuss to us to transport goods and help we need .
Electric trains are generally considered more environmentally friendly than diesel trains because they produce lower greenhouse gas emissions. However, the overall environmental impact of electric trains depends on factors such as the source of electricity generation for powering the trains. Using renewable energy sources to generate electricity can further reduce their environmental impact.
they are good in a way it depends on what you are talking about they are good for the environment they look good
I am guessing it help makes it stop on time
Trains created a whole new source of transportation. it was faster bigger and less aerating than carriages.