I will guess you are talking about measuring oxygen saturation with an oximeter?
This would be O2 sat or sats, as in saturation. Many, many people do say O2 stats. As is statistics, or possibly status. It is a single number, therefore it is not ever statistics, a plural. And status isn't really shortened that way, and a single O sat does not equate a status. Now if you are talking about ABGs...
Pet peeve of mine. :) Thanks for asking
2H2O2------------ 2 H2O + O2 thus correct coefficient is 2
The correct way to write oxygen is O2. The 2 should be subscripted.
No, the chemical equation is not balanced. The correct balanced equation is 2SO2 + O2 → 2SO3.
I believe the correct formula is Cu-H2-O2.
This is not an equation at all. An example of a correct (and balanced) equation would be: 2H2 + O2 --> 2 H2O
No, chemical reactions can be reversed. For example: 2H2O -> 2H2 + O2 can change back, 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O
C6H12O6 + 6 O2 → 6 CO2 + 6 H2O + ATP energy
You don't. Buy the correct sensor.
The correct chemical equation for forming water molecules is: 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O. This equation shows the combination of two molecules of hydrogen gas (H2) with one molecule of oxygen gas (O2) to produce two molecules of water (H2O).
No. Speed sensors tell the speedometer how fast you are travelling, O2 sensors provide information to the ECU to enable it to provide the correct fuel/air mix to the engine.
Correct as they may not displace enough O2 to put the fire out-causing it to reignite.
The equation is not correct because there are not the same number of each element on each side of the equation.6CO2 + 6H2O ==> C6H12O6 + 6O2