the australian record would be the fastest time ever run by an australian (it's the same concept with other countries, i.e. American record, British record, etc.) the olympic record is the fastest time ever run in the Olympics, and the commonwealth record is the fastest time ever run in the commonwealth games. and of course, the world record is the fastest time ever run. the olympic record can only be set in the olympics, and the commonwealth record can only be set in the commonwealth games. the australian and world record can be set anywhere at any time.
The Australian record is the best performance by an Australian athlete in a specific event, the Olympic record is the best performance at the Olympic Games, the Commonwealth record is the best performance by an athlete from a Commonwealth country, and the world record is the best performance globally. These records can be set during official competitions where approved officials are present to verify the result.
besartfsg55h
Australian Olympic Committee was created in 1895.
No difference
One is bigger than the other
This is a difficult question it can be heaps Olympic and Commenwealth sportsmen and women and rugby laegue players can get really injured
greek historians and olympic games read their poetry
There is no difference at allthey are both represented for the same reason:) :):) :) :) :)
Melbourne was the Australian city that held the 1956 Olympic Games.
in Olympic boxing you were a head guard in professional boxing you dont
No, Greece did on 2004 Olympic game
There were 433 athletes that were in the Australian Olympic team went to the 2008 Beijing Olympics Games.
The Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) was built in Canberra after Australia's poor showing at the 1976 Olympic Games to develop Australian athletes for the future.