One view is that the Apostle Paul taught him about Jesus. A view that became current in the second century is that Mark wrote down everything that Peter told him about Jesus. Yet another is that Mark was the young man whom the women found in the sepulchre on the third day of the crucifixion. Even if true, none of these is evidence that Mark met Jesus.
Actually it was Jesus that told the women to tell his disciples meet him in Galilee, (Matthew 28.10)
Jesus did not actually meet any kings, except in Luke's Gospel where the account of the trial differs significantly from the other gospels. In this Gospel, Jesus was sent by Pontius Pilate to Herod Antipas, king of Galilee, for judgement.
Gethsemane was not the Apostle Mark's house. Gethsemane wasn't a town, it was actually a garden where Jesus took the disciples to pray.
The inspired Bible book of Mark indicates in chapter 1 the physical location that Jesus had arrived from. While John the Baptizer was preaching in Judea, Jesus joins him. Mark 1:9 says, "In the course of those days, Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized in the Jordan by John."
Mark was a follower/ disciple of Jesus. He was of no blood kin.
Mark begins with an account of Jesus' baptism.
Yes. Mark was an eye-witness to the events of Jesus's time.
Mark was never a disciple of jesus christ .He wrote the gospel of Mark. he did not write the book of act.
A:Mark's Gospel does not actually mention Jesus carrying his cross, although it is assumed he did at first, until Simon of Cyrene, who was passing by, was ordered to carry the cross for Jesus (Mark 15:21). This is followed by both Matthew and Luke, which are more or less directly dependent on Mark. It is in John's Gospel that we find Jesus carrying the cross all the way to the site of his crucifixion - John 19:17.
When you die
Mark, who wrote the Gospel of Mark, was a disciple of Peter, who was a disciple of Jesus.
The gospel of Mark is a biography of Jesus written by John Mark