Lemche, in a careful analysis of the Old Testament traditions (Early Israel: Anthropological and Historical Studies on the Israelite Society Before the Monarchy), has shown that the covenant concept seems to have played no significant role in Israel's religious life before the sixth century BCE. He considers it a fundamental mistake simply to assume that, because The Bible claims Israelite religion to have been unique from its very beginnings, it must have been so. He goes on to suggest that its special characteristics were the results of a long historical development, rather than its point of departure. The biblical traditions arose in an age which is much later than the age they purport to refer, so these traditions reflect the thinking of the end of a process rather than its origins.
We usually think of the Hebrew Bible as having been written by divinely inspired prophets who can readily be identified, including Moses in the second century BCE. Ronald E. Clements (The World of Ancient Israel: Sociological, Anthropological and Political Perspectives, Israel in its historical and cultural setting) says the Old Testament was composed as the product of a very prolonged literary activity in which few wholly separate and self-contained independent works can be identified. The distinction between 'authors' and 'editors' has become increasingly blurred, and in some cases almost meaningless. The prophetic books for example, were clearly not written by prophets, but represent distilled collections of prophetic material, often from diverse ages. In the history subsequent to the early Exilic period, there is little evidence of activity by named prophets, and on most understandings of the prophetic role the particular function of the prophet had come to an end. Instead of prophets writing books in their own names, we find the books such as Proverbs, Job, Ecclesiastes, Ecclesiasticus, the Wisdom of Solomon and some of the psalms written anonymously and, in time, attributed to earlier heroes. As for the history of the Hebrew people, the Book of Chronicles, dated to the middle of the fourth century BCE, was a complete rewrite of the Deuteronomic History, with an altered emphasis and much material omitted or altered to suit a new theological and political climate.
In Magic: The Gathering, being exiled does not count as dying. Exiled cards are removed from the game temporarily, but they are not considered dead or destroyed.
Exiled.
mantua
Yes, creatures that are indestructible can still be exiled from the battlefield through effects that specifically exile them, such as spells or abilities that exile target creatures. Indestructible only prevents creatures from being destroyed, not from being exiled.
After he was exiled, Leon Trotsky never returned to power. He was murdered while in Mexico.
No
No, being exiled in Magic: The Gathering does not count as dying. Exiling a card removes it from the game temporarily, but it is not considered to be destroyed or killed.
Mantua
He escapes
The Ottoman Empire provided a limited freedom of religion in that Jews and Christians could live in the Ottoman Empire as second-class citizens (as opposed to being forcibly converted or exiled).
The opposite of exiled is "returned" or "reinstated." It signifies the act of being brought back to one's home or original place of belonging.
The year 1857 marks the date of the last Mughal emperor being exiled to Burma by the English.