To abstain from or act together in abstaining from using, buying, or dealing with as an expression of protest or disfavor or as a means of coercion means to boycott. In other words, to boycott means not to buy something... like how some people wouldn't buy tea from theEnglish before the US was founded. Boston Tea Party stuff. boycotts work if you want them to.
he led 12 boycotts :)
That boycotts could be successful.
Matin Luther King did 4 boycotts.
colonial boycotts hated the colonists and England traded
Consumer boycotts were an effective tool in forcing business owners to pass safety laws
Sitin, petitions, boycotts.
Boycotts were an effective tool for social changeHope this helps your test :)
Colonial boycotts of British goods
I have NO idea sorry ;(
Whites could easily counter the economics of the boycotts
The effectiveness of a boycott often depends on the specific context and goals of the action. In many cases, boycotts can successfully apply economic pressure on companies or governments, leading to policy changes or improved practices. However, results can vary, and some boycotts may not achieve their intended outcomes, especially if they lack widespread support or if targeted entities are resilient. Overall, while some boycotts have been successful, others may fall short of their objectives.
Boycotts