Matthew.
1. To the two Marys (xxviii, 9).
2. To the eleven in Galilee (17).
Mark.
1. To Mary Magdalene (xvi, 9).
2. To two of his disciples (l2).
3. To the eleven at meat (14).
The appearances of Jesus mentioned in Mark are all in the apocryphal supplement. The Gospel of Mark proper does not record a single appearance of Jesus.
Luke.
1. To Cleopas and his companion (xxiv, 13-31).
2. To Simon (Peter) (34).
3. To the eleven and others (36).
John.
1. To Mary Magdalene (xx, 14-18).
2. To ten (? Judas was dead at this time) disciples (19-24).
3. To the eleven (26-29).
4. To Peter, John and others (xxi).
The last chapter of this Gospel, which contains the account of his fourth appearance, and which ascribes the authorship of the Gospel to the "beloved disciple" (John), is a forgery.
No two of the Evangelists agree. No two of them are fully agreed in regard to a single appearance. Each not only omits the appearances mentioned by the others, but his narrative in nearly every instance excludes them. As Strauss says, "The designation of the locality in one excludes the appearances narrated by the rest; the determination of time in another leaves no space for the narratives of his fellow-evangelists; the enumeration of a third is given without any regard to the events reported by his predecessors; lastly, among several appearances recounted by various narrators, each claims to be the last, and yet has nothing in common with the others. Hence nothing but wilful blindness can prevent the perception that no one of the narrators knew and presupposed what another records."
Referring to the different accounts of the resurrection given by the Evangelists, Dr. Westcott says: "They contain difficulties which it is impossible to explain with certainty" (Introduction to Study of Gospels, p. 329).
Dr. Farrar makes the following admission: "Any one who will attentively read side by side the narratives of these appearances on the first day of the resurrection, will see that they have only been preserved for us in general, interblended, and scattered notices, which, in strict exactness, render it impossible, without many arbitrary suppositions, to produce from them a certain narrative of the order of events. The lacunae, the compressions, the variations, the actual differences, the subjectivity of the narrators as affected by spiritual revelations, render all harmonies at the best uncertain" (Life of Christ, Vol. II, p. 432, note).
Jesus appeared to the disciples after his resurrection on the third day.
Jesus did not ever appear to Peter privately after His resurrection.
No. They did not believe in a resurrection, and Jesus is the resurrection and the life, (John 11.25)
No, Thomas did not touch Jesus to confirm his resurrection.
Yes, Thomas touching Jesus after his resurrection was significant because it provided physical proof of Jesus' resurrection, reinforcing Thomas' belief in his resurrection and divinity.
After the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Jesus appears to the disciples after his resurrection, showing himself to them in physical form to prove he is alive. This occurs in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
Angels announced the resurrection of Jesus (Mark 16:1-8)
Jesus was in the grave for three days before his resurrection.
Jesus was in the tomb for three days before his resurrection.
After his resurrection, Jesus was seen by his disciples, Mary Magdalene, and other followers.
Not sure what you mean, but unless question is made clearer, candles are not a resurrection of Jesus.