The Jews and samaratins had no dealings with each other, they the samaratins were outcasts Jews who married outsiders and worshiped idols.
Answer:
According to Jewish sources (2 Kings 17:24), after the Assyrians exiled the Israelite Ten Tribes, the Assyrian king brought non-Jews from Cutha, Babylonia and Syria (Hamat), and settled them in the depopulated area where the Ten Tribes had lived (Samaria). They were taught Judaism by one of the Jewish priests (2 Kings 17:27), and they were taught the Torah, which they wrote in the Old Hebrew script.
The Talmud relates how the Samaritans adopted some of the mitzvot (Torah-commands) but not others (Talmud, Berakhot 47b), how they denounced the Jews to Alexander in an unsuccessful attempt to get him to destroy the newly-built Second Temple (Talmud, Yoma 69a), and how they interfered with the declaring of Rosh Hodesh (the New Moon) (Talmud, Rosh Hashanah 22b). Our traditions relate how the Samaritans would waylay the Jews who tried to journey to the Holy Temple.
yes.
The Jews of Persia were Hebrews that moved to Persia. They were the same people.
Catholics believe Jesus went to hell nd Jews don't
The event that stabilized the formerly tenuous relationship between Christians and Jews is the Second Vatican Council. The other name for the old testament is Torah.
Yes there is a relationship between the old testament and the law , as the book of Moses Leviticus is full of laws the Jews had to follow.
Yes there is. Friends with benifits
Yes, they forbade marriage, affairs and any kind of sexual relationship between Jews and Germans (which was later specified in great detail).
No single Event stabilized relations between Christians and Jew. When Christians stopped persecuting Jews in different regions of the world and spreading libelous information about Jews, relations improved.
Relations were difficult and often tense.
When Jesus rode the jews into jeruselum the zealots where the ones laying down the palm leaves
He was king of the Persian Empire and the Jews were a part of his empire, the ten tribes of the north and the two tribes - Judah and Benjamin in the south, under provincial governors appointed by him.
The answer to this question entirely depends on which society the Jew is living in. There could be a relationship predicated on Jewish extermination (like Nazi Germany), a relationship predicated on hostile permissions punctuated by pogroms (like Czarist Russia), a relationship predicated on permissibility of presence with strong discrimination in various parts of life (like the Republic of Venice), a relationship predicated on overt taxation and humiliation, but freedom of movement and occupation (like the Ottoman Empire), a relationship predicated on separating themselves from the non-Jews in all-Jewish towns (like in Poland of the 1700s), a relationship predicated in sharing values with non-Jews, but not equality (like Germany of the 1800s), a relationship predicated on social inequality, but otherwise general equality (like the United States of the 1800s), a relationship of legal and social parity with non-Jews (like the current United Kingdom), or a relationship predicated on Jewish control of the apparatuses of government (like modern Israel). In each variation, there were different overarching rules and microclimates of varying relationships between Jews and non-Jews.