Absolutely. In a dramatic departure from the customs of the time, Jesus spoke to a woman at a well--and she was a foreigner and a disreputable woman at that. See John 4. His disciples were astonished John 4:27 And upon this came his disciples, and marvelled that he talked with the woman: yet no man said, What seekest thou? or, Why talkest thou with her? Jesus praised Mary, the woman who sat at His feet listening instead of rushing around preparing hospitality as did her sister Martha. Luke 10:38-42 And in Galatians 3:28 Paul the Apostle declares "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." However, there is no doubt that both the Old and New Testaments see somewhat different roles for men and women. For example, pastors and elders are a position that should only be men "the husband of just one wife." (I Timothy 3). In another in another book penned by the Apostle Paul, there is an order of authority-- Ephesians 5: 22Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. 23For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. 24Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. But in the same passage, the scripture also states that men and women should be in mutual submission to one another, mutually loving and sacrificially serving each other. Ephesians 5:21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. (See also Romans 12:10b; Phillippians 2.3; Galatians 5.13) This, too, was a dramatic change from the culture of the time.
No
No one they were treated the same way they always had been as second class citizens.
Women of wealth were not usually treated any different than men. The reason for this is that wealthy women were usually someone connected to royalty. Still, the role of women would never be confused with the superiority of men.
women were treated fairly by their families in France.
This was because of the 'patriachal society'. This meant men were seen as the superiors and women the wives and mothers.
A:No. If women's rights were based on biblical principles, modern women would have few rights.
women had rights and were generally treated with respect.
Women were treated as they always had been through out history and that was as second class citizens. They had no rights, they couldn't inherit, and many were abused. It is only in modern times that women have really seen a time of growth and freedom. Never before have women been able to attain as much as they have in the last 20 years.
Presumably the women in biblical times covered their hair (as it was common practice at that time), but the specific concept of the hijab is not in the Bible.
Oil lamps were used for light in Biblical times.
Slavery affected:Jews in Biblical times with the Pharoahs in Ancient Egypt.Poor people and orphaned children in every century since Biblical times.African men, women, and children.Slavery continues in many countries today.
Back in biblical times, males were dominant over women. Most women were lucky if they could read or write and some people even thought women preaching was a bad thing for the church.