0
False dilemma is a logical fallacy. A logical fallacy is a tool used to point out an inherent weakness in an argument. Several fallacies are used over and over again in various contexts and so it has become useful to categorize these fallacies so they can be pointed out and acted on.
The false dilemma is a logical fallacy where the arguer states that only two outcomes are possible when reality shows that there may be many more.
For examples, see "An example of false dilemma?" link below.
What else can I help you with?
Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
Can a valid argument lead to a false conclusion?
Yes, a valid argument can lead to a false conclusion if the premises are true but the reasoning process is flawed.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
Can an argument be valid even if it contains false premises?
Yes, an argument can be valid even if it contains false premises. Validity in an argument refers to the logical structure, where the conclusion follows logically from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or false.
A fallacious argument uses?
It can use a false proposition to start with or a deduction which is not valid.
What is the difference between a valid fact and a valid argument?
Facts cannot be valid. They can only be true or false. Arguments, on the other hand, can be valid. A valid argument in one which must have a true conclusion provided that the premises are true (no guarantee of that though).
What makes a valid argument invalid?
A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.
Can an argument be valid with false conclusions?
An argument can be logically valid, but quite demonstrably wrong, because its first premise is false.How to choose the right starting points is a difficult part, if not impossible...Who knows which axioms are "correct" ?
What makes a valid deductive argument?
A valid deductive argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. The form of the argument must be such that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show that when the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. It will demonstrate that the argument follows the rules of deductive logic and the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
How Can a strong inductive argument have a false conclusion?
Since an inductive argument is an argument where the truth of the premises make it reasonable to hold that the conclusion is true, it does not necessarily guarantee it, meaning you could have a false conclusion.
