The Bible is primarily a religious and spiritual text, not a scientific one, and its purpose is to convey moral and theological truths rather than scientific facts. While some interpretations of biblical passages may conflict with modern scientific understanding, many believers view the Bible's messages as compatible with science when understood metaphorically or contextually. Discrepancies often arise from differing interpretations of the text and the nature of scientific inquiry. Ultimately, whether one views the Bible as scientifically inaccurate can depend on their perspective on faith and science.
no
Yes. People will say it is a stem, but this is scientifically inaccurate.
As they are not actual word-for-word translations , paraphrases are inaccurate versions of the Bible, and I personally think one of the worst of the lot is "The Message" by Eugene Peterson.
You can't be both a christian and modern scientifically educated person because the Bible" can not have two boss", Godand devil
There is no description of rainbow in the Bible. It's only referred to, as "the bow".
"you just got to believe!" You could always say that God and Jesus aren't science. Since God and Jesus have supernatural powers, and since science doesn't support supernatural powers or religion and faith, people would always say The Bible isn't scientifically accurate - The Bible is just a recording what Jesus taught us, but The Bible is accurate with faith and religion. The Bible isn't scientifically accurate only because science is the practice of fact and leaves out all traces of faith and religion, so this whole statement is a response to someone who says that The Bible isn't scientifically accurate.
(1) that The Bible is consistent with itself (2) that the Bible corresponds with reality (3) that the Bible's claims can be scientifically demonstrated
(1) that the Bible is consistent with itself (2) that the Bible corresponds with reality (3) that the Bible's claims can be scientifically demonstrated
Yes very accurate. I personally have never heard of a mistake due to ultra sound. Also scientifically it is impossible to be inaccurate.
Experiments that test to see if dogs are color blind must use a control group. Otherwise, the results are inaccurate and not scientifically valid.
That he was teaching the scientifically proven method of evolution rather than the literal translation of The Bible.
The bottom line is it would be wasteful and foolish to use the entire population when a sample, drawn scientifically, provides accuracy in representing your population of interest. Assessing all individuals may be impossible, impractical, expensive or even inaccurate.