The temple that was destroyed during the time of Jesus' death was the Second Temple in Jerusalem.
Yes, the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, about 40 years after the death of Jesus.
No, the temple was not destroyed during the crucifixion of Jesus. The temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD by the Romans.
Yes. He predicted that the temple would be destroyed and rebuilt in three days. His body was the temple and his resurrection occured three days after his death.
Because both Jesus and King David were a prophet who have acknowledge of several holiest place. A: There was never a King David's temple, the first temple was built by king Solomon after David's death. In Jesus' time the Jews worshiped at Herod's temple that stood in the place of Solomon's temple that was destroyed by the Babylonians hundreds of years before.
In 70 CE by the Romans.
According to Judaism, yes. Jesus died somewhere between 30-35 CE. The Temple continued operating until 70 CE when it was destroyed. That makes a minimum of 35 years where Jewish sacrifices were accepted by God after Jesus' death.According to Christianity, the Christ was the final and perfect sacrifice, and therefore no further sacrifice was needed or would be accepted. Therefore God would not have accepted Jewish sacrifices after Jesus' death.
No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.No, the Romans destroyed the second temple in 70 AD.
The Romans destroyed the Second Temple.
No temple was destroyed then. The Temple of King Solomon was destroyed in 587 by the Babylonians.
Jerusalem was not destroyed in 70 AD. The temple was destroyed. Much of the city remained after the final battle. One can read two messages in the destruction of the temple. One was that it actually was an accident that it was burnt, as the ancient writers claim. The other was that the destruction of the temple was a fulfillment of Jesus' prophesy.
Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.Yes. They were the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 AD after the first Jewish war. Even before this, in the time of Jesus, Jerusalem was ruled by the Romans, as it was part of the province of Syria.