The main argument claiming that there is no conflict between science and religion is basically that God is a scientist, or at least works with science... that he understands and uses the forces of the universe to do what he does. As it has been throughout Earth's history, what looks like magic to one group is actually the technology of the other. If God knows everything, which is part of the definition of God, then what he does looks impossible and miraculous to us, but it is explainable once we get to a sufficient level to understand it.
There are many books that delve into the relationship between science and religion; however, many of these books have a bias towards science or a bias towards religion. Some books that delve into the relationship between science and religion are "Science and Christianity: Conflict or Coherence?" by Henry F. Schaefer III and "Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" by Stephen Jay Gould.
Ian T. Ramsey has written: 'Joseph Butler, 1692-1752, author of The analogy of religion' -- subject(s): Biography 'Joseph Butler 1692-1752, author of 'The analogy of religion': Some features of his life and thought' 'Religious language' -- subject(s): Theology, Philosophy, Semantics (Philosophy), Terminology, Christianity 'Religion and science' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion and science: conflict and synthesis, some philosophical reflections' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Models and mystery' -- subject(s): Methodology, Theology 'Christian empiricism' -- subject(s): Addresses, essays, lectures, Philosophy, Philosophy and religion, Christianity 'Personality and science' -- subject(s): Psychiatry, Medical ethics, Philosophy, Personality change, Physician and patient 'Our understanding of prayer' -- subject(s): Prayer, Christianity
The relationship between religion and science has been a focus of the demarcation problem. Somewhat related is the claim that statements about the world made by science and religion may rely on different methodologies. Religion, is often argued to rely on revelation and faith. The methods of science are elaborate and science does not depend on faith. Some scholars say the two are separate, as in John William Draper's conflict thesis and Stephen Jay Gould's non-overlapping magisteria, while others (Thomas Berry, Brian Swimme, Ken Wilber, et al.) propose an interconnection. The Pew Forum has published data on attitudes about religion and science.ConflictA variety of historical, philosophical, and scientific arguments have been put forth in favor of the idea that science and religion are in conflict. Historical examples of religious individuals or institutions promoting claims that contradict both contemporary and modern scientific consensus include creationism (see level of support for evolution), the Roman Catholic Church's opposition to heliocentrism from 1616 to 1757 including the Galileo affair, and more recently, Pope Benedict XVI's 2009 statements claiming that the use of condoms to combat the AIDS epidemic in Africa was ineffective and counterproductive. Additionally, long held religious claims have been challenged by scientific studies such as STEP, which examined the efficacy of prayer. A number of scientists including Jerry Coyne have made an argument for a philosophical incompatibility between religion and science. An argument for the conflict between religion and science that combines the historical and philosophical approaches has been presented by Neil Degrasse Tyson-Tyson argues that religious scientists, such as Newton, could have achieved more had they not accepted religious answers to unresolved scientific issues.
There are many reasons for conflict. However, some common culprits of conflict include religion, money, as well as personal relationships.
Science doesn't really have much use for religion, but some religions do accept scientific discoveries. So, in those cases, the two can "mix."
Some examples of arguments that commonly occur in real life include disagreements over politics, religion, relationships, money, and personal beliefs. These arguments can arise between friends, family members, coworkers, and even strangers.
The theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin in the 19th century caused conflict between religion and science, particularly with creationist beliefs. This theory challenged traditional religious beliefs about the origins of life on Earth and led to debates about faith versus scientific evidence. The conflict between religious beliefs and scientific theories continues to be a topic of controversy in some communities today.
Religion is a very complicated subject, since there are many different religions, and each religion is subject to many different interpretations. Science is much more unified. I would say that there are at least some interpretations of religion which are compatible with science. There are also interpretations of religion which are incompatible with science. The choice is yours.
Science and religion both seek to explain the world around us, but they operate in different ways. Science uses evidence and experimentation to understand the natural world, while religion often involves faith and belief in the supernatural. Some people find that science and religion can complement each other, while others see them as fundamentally incompatible. Ultimately, how they are related depends on individual perspectives and interpretations.
Any that have made any positive contribution to the human knowledge base do. Albert Einstein said "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind" Science cannot go anywhere without the goal of making the world a better place via religious values. As has been seen throughout history, religion without science goes way off track as well. Any that have made any positive contribution to the human knowledge base do. Albert Einstein said "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind" Science cannot go anywhere without the goal of making the world a better place via religious values. As has been seen throughout history, religion without science goes way off track as well.
Religion is never studied scientifically and science is often banned by religion. The Catholic Church banned science for a thousand years in the Middle Ages.
rational (name of religion) there isn't one really also what do you mean by science, science is knowledge, do some religious people not believe in knowledge