The relationship between religion and science has been a focus of the demarcation problem. Somewhat related is the claim that statements about the world made by science and religion may rely on different methodologies. Religion, is often argued to rely on revelation and faith. The methods of science are elaborate and science does not depend on faith. Some scholars say the two are separate, as in John William Draper's conflict thesis and Stephen Jay Gould's non-overlapping magisteria, while others (Thomas Berry, Brian Swimme, Ken Wilber, et al.) propose an interconnection. The Pew Forum has published data on attitudes about religion and science.
ConflictA variety of historical, philosophical, and scientific arguments have been put forth in favor of the idea that science and religion are in conflict. Historical examples of religious individuals or institutions promoting claims that contradict both contemporary and modern scientific consensus include creationism (see level of support for evolution), the Roman Catholic Church's opposition to heliocentrism from 1616 to 1757 including the Galileo affair, and more recently, Pope Benedict XVI's 2009 statements claiming that the use of condoms to combat the AIDS epidemic in Africa was ineffective and counterproductive. Additionally, long held religious claims have been challenged by scientific studies such as STEP, which examined the efficacy of prayer. A number of scientists including Jerry Coyne have made an argument for a philosophical incompatibility between religion and science. An argument for the conflict between religion and science that combines the historical and philosophical approaches has been presented by Neil Degrasse Tyson-Tyson argues that religious scientists, such as Newton, could have achieved more had they not accepted religious answers to unresolved scientific issues.The church was losing power and not happy about it. So the people dedicated to the church went against the people crossing over into a science point of view. It was a different point of view for everybody and if you didnt join what someone thought that you should join then they basically thought you were an idiot.
Science can tell us how things really happened.
science
generalities,philosophy,religion,language,natural science,applied science,arts,literature, geography and social science
Most religions provide a story about how the world was created - all these religious stories do no match up with the factual, observable evidence about how the world was created (the subject of Earth Science). Thus the development of Earth Science (indeed science in general) has lead to people falling away from belief in the religious explanations for things and sadly from religion itself.
Religion is not a science.
evolutionists religion creation
R. C. Wallace has written: 'Science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion, science and the modern world' -- subject(s): Religion and science
Albert Einstein said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" in his 1954 essay "Science and Religion." In the essay, he emphasized the importance of understanding and integrating both science and religion for a more holistic view of the world.
; The quote is Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. : Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941More quotes of Albert Einstein; see link "Quotes Albert Einstein" on left.
It is an art as it can not be a science.
God created the world including science, hence science and religion are interconnected.
Sumit vashishtha
Peter Gottschalk has written: 'Religion, science, and empire' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Historiography, Religion and politics, Religion and sociology, History
Religion.
Of course. Philosophy is a way of life - religion is a belief system - they can, but do not need, to clash. As most religions hold the same porecepts (oir cammandments if you will) to be true, there is often no clash at all.
The church was losing power and not happy about it. So the people dedicated to the church went against the people crossing over into a science point of view. It was a different point of view for everybody and if you didnt join what someone thought that you should join then they basically thought you were an idiot.