The reasons for the eventual fall of the Abbassid Caliphate which occurred in 1100-1258 CE are the following.
1) Corruption: The Abbassid Caliphate had become one of the richest and most prosperous states in the world at that time, changing its leadership from honest brokers of power (Amir al-Mu'aminin - Prince of the Believers used to actually mean something) to individuals more concerned with money. This created strong resentment from those who were outside of the Abbassid purview.
2) Mawali Inclusion: The Abbassids were an Arab Caliphate (as opposed to the Samanids who were a Persian Caliphate) and were expected by many Arabs to treat other Arabs better than the Mawali. However, the Abbassids consistently treated Persians equal to or better than their Arab brethren which created animosity and a sense of betrayal. Many Arabs saw the Persians as the major backers of the Caliphate and that they were a tool for Persian interests. It was also perceived that the Persians were first servants to the caliphs but climbed way up the social ladder to a place they did not belong.
3) Turkish Armies: Armies like the Mamluk (who were retained by the Abbassids for the defense of the Caliphate) were Turks who defended an Arab State. Beginning in this period, they began to realize that they had the capacity to create their own states considering how vast their powers were as a military. This idea also came to the fore for Turks outside of the Caliphate. As a result, there were Mamluk uprisings, Seljuq attacks, and other Turkish Armies turning against Baghdad.
4) Rise of the Mongols: Hülegü Khan put the final nail in the coffin by massacring Baghdad and a number of Persian cities when he conquered the territory for the Great Khanate.
The Abbasids fell to an ambush of the mongols; while Umayyads fell to economics.
factions and opposing groups.
the rebelion conquered.
ruhith azad
the rebelion conquered.
The lack of money led to their decline.
The wealth that fueled Abbasid power allowed for cultural and scientific advancements, transforming Baghdad into a center of learning and trade. However, this same wealth led to internal corruption, social stratification, and a reliance on luxury, weakening the state’s administrative efficiency. Additionally, the affluent lifestyle of the elite alienated the lower classes, fostering discontent and rebellion. Ultimately, the lack of unity and the overextension of resources contributed to the decline of the Abbasid Caliphate.
The Seljuk Turks significantly impacted the Abbasid Empire by providing military support that helped stabilize the empire during a time of fragmentation. However, their rise also led to the decline of Abbasid authority, as they assumed control over much of the empire's territory and governance. The Seljuks established their own sultanate, which diminished the caliph's political power, although the Abbasids retained religious authority. This shift ultimately contributed to the fragmentation of the empire and the emergence of regional powers.
Vizier
The imperial caliphal state was eclipsed due to a combination of internal fragmentation, external pressures, and the rise of regional powers. The Abbasid Caliphate, once a unifying force, faced challenges from rival dynasties, such as the Fatimids and Umayyads in Spain, which weakened its authority. Additionally, invasions by the Mongols and Crusaders further destabilized the region. Ultimately, the loss of centralized control and the emergence of local governance led to the decline of the caliphal state.
3 factors that led to the end of feudalism was the bubonic plague, the hundreds' years war, and the magna carta
Drought and a decline in trade