After Thomas Becket's assassination in 1170, Edward Grim, who was present during the attack, survived despite being severely injured while trying to protect Becket. He later became a monk and was associated with the Abbey of St. Augustine in Canterbury. Grim is known for his eyewitness account of Becket's murder, which contributed to the historical understanding of the event and Becket's subsequent canonization as a saint. His writings reflect the tumultuous relationship between the church and the monarchy during that period.
Edward Grim was a clerk who witnessed the murder of Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. Grim's arm was severely wounded in defense of the Archbishop. He later wrote a biography of Becket, including a detailed account of the murder.
Edward Grim was a cleric who witnessed the murder of Thomas Becket in 1170. He described the brutal attack on Becket by the knights, emphasizing the chaos and violence of the scene. Grim's account highlights Becket's bravery and steadfastness in the face of death, portraying him as a martyr for his principles. His testimony served to underscore the significance of Becket's murder in the conflict between church and state.
king the second murdered Thomas Becket because he didnt support the king
edward said that he saw the murder and that reginald turned against him and killed thomas beckett ... !! xx <3 ;]]
According to Edward Grim's eyewitness account they hide them under a sycamore tree, and their metal armor under cloaks.
The monks who witnessed Thomas Becket's murder in 1170 were named Edward Grim, a cleric who was injured while trying to defend Becket, and a few others who were present in Canterbury Cathedral at the time. Grim later wrote an account of the event, providing one of the most detailed descriptions of Becket's martyrdom. Other monks present included Reginald of Canterbury and possibly several unnamed witnesses.
According to Edward Grim, friend and confident of Thomas Becket, and present at his death; the Archbishop was killed by chopping blow to the head, with a sword, exposing brain matter as Becket was in repose on his knees in prayer before his attackers. History tells us Grim was injured in the arm by the very blow that slayed Becket.
Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, was murdered on the 29th December, 1170. Henry II had supposedly lost his temper and yelled something along the lines of "who will rid me of this troublesome priest" (the exact words were lost in history). Four knights overheard this and 'misunderstood', so, they then went to Canterbury Cathedral and killed him. It was on the 3rd blow from the sword that he fell, and on the 4th they lopped of his head and his 'brains spilled out' (nasty stuff, isn't it?) according to Edward Grim, best friend and clerk. Grim also got hurt in the attack, when one of the knights hit Becket the second time, it missed and hit Grim in the shoulder. As far as I know (I've done a bit of research) not a lot is known about the funeral. Hope this helps!
Thomas Becket was murdered by Reginald Fitzurse, Hugh de Moreville, William de Tracy and Richard Brito. Grim was a monk who witnessed the murder and was himself injured. He wrote an account of the murder. Note: The name of the last knight above should be Richard le Breton. He was an ancestor of Lilly Langtry whose maiden name was le Breton.
Edward Grim's account of Thomas Becket's death differs from the film primarily in its emphasis on the details of the event and the motivations behind the actions of the knights involved. Grim, who was present during the murder, provides a firsthand perspective that highlights Becket's steadfastness and martyrdom, while the film may dramatize or alter these elements for cinematic effect. Additionally, the film may condense events or characters for narrative clarity, leading to differences in the portrayal of the historical context and its implications. Overall, the variations reflect the balance between historical accuracy and artistic interpretation.
Four of the five attackers witnessed his death and there were a few members of the cathedral staff present who later wrote accounts of the murder. Of the attackers, the knights Reginald fitzUrse, William de Tracy and Richard le Breton and the chaplain Hugh de Horsea actually struck the Archbishop with their swords, killing him. The fourth knight, Hugh de Morville, had been posted at a small doorway to prevent anyone coming to aid the Archbishop and he may not have seen the murder. With Thomas Becket were the secular clerk Edward Grim and another clerk to the Archbishop, William firzStephen. Edward Grim attempted to ward of a sword cut and had his arm nearly cut off. It is possible that few monks had walked into the chapel with Thomas Becket, but it is not clear if they remained to witness the murder or if they went to join the other monks singing Vespers in the choir. Edward Grim's account of the murder was written soon afterwards and is considered the most reliable version by many historians.
the knights took several hits to Thomas, The first saved by a fathful friend Edward Grim. But Thomas opened his arms and didn't fight back as if he wanted to die. He said his time had come God wanted him. The Knights sliced of the top of his head and picked out his brain. They chucked it accross the floor and left him for the dead!