a government with strict rules
no because you should be able to believe what ever you want to! and NOBODY should tell you different!
It was a strict, works-based religion based on a lot of rules. They left England because they felt the Church was corrupt and not strict enough.
strict, dictatorial people have no say or freedom in how, government rules, opposite of democracy.
It's not a question but a statement.
probably because of some strict contemporary religious rules. Refer to the religious opposition to the early renaissance
it was the first system of rules and control. kind of a strict government set up.
A theocracy is a form of government that rules based on religious laws and principles. In a theocracy, religious leaders often hold political power and govern in accordance with religious beliefs. Examples include Iran and Vatican City.
In the Philippines, government rules and regulations are strict. The implementation, on the other hand, is the exact opposite. Law enforcers do not put enough emphasis on the implementation.
Mustafa Kemal ruled his country based on a secular and westernized set of laws, while the Ayatollah Khomeini did it following strict Islamic religious laws.
Since I am a guy i know that women are more strict on religious stuff.
a monarchy