Another Answer from our community:
Jesus ministers for forty days after his resurrection-Kingdom to be restored to Israel at a later time-The Twelve to bear witness in Jerusalem, Judæa, Samaria, and the uttermost parts of the earth-Jesus ascends into heaven-Matthias chosen to fill the vacancy in the Twelve.
Another Answer:
Uta Ranke-Heinemann (Putting Away Childish Things) describes Acts of the Apostles as a work of Propaganda aimed at Gentile Christians and Gentiles who have not yet become Christians. I believe it is much more sophisticated than Ranke-Heinemann believes: I believe its primary purpose was to compare Saints Peter and Paul, thereby defining Peter as a greater apostle than Paul. Acts attributes to Paul miracles that he himself seems not to have known about, but in each case attributes a comparable and even more amazing miracle to Peter.
Acts of the Apostles begins with the ascension of Jesus and then the Pentecost. Under the leadership of Peter, the apostles choose Matthias to replace Judas, to make up the twelve. The book then continues with what has traditionally been regarded as a history of the early Church.
Because the book very clearly contains material based on Antiquities of the Jews, published by Josephus in 93 CE, it must have been written later than that date. Many scholars also believe it must have been written before the end of the century because by then Paul's epistles were beginning to circulate widely and the author of Acts of the Apostles would not have included the differences and discrepancies that can be found in his account. Again, I disagree with these scholars on this point. I believe it was written after the beginning of the second century because Paul's epistles were beginning to circulate widely. Much of the material in Acts can be seen to be loosely based on Paul's own accounts, which certainly means that 'Luke' was aware of them. He may have been concerned at what he believed to be the excessive veneration of Paul, or he may have sought to unite Christians in his view of the Christian message, rather than Paul's. Either way, the comparison with Peter was intended to diminish Paul's legacy.
As stated above, Acts contains material based on Antiquities of the Jews. Ranke-Heinemann also finds an important passage based on The Bacchae by Euripides in the fifth century BCE. As for the story of Stephen, which Actsuses to introduce Saul as the callow youth who supported the stoning but was unwilling to participate, Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says that we can never verify the martyrdom or even existence of Stephen. There is nothing in Paul's own epistles that supports the first missionary journey and in fact that journey is at odds with Paul's own account of his travels.
Who is Stephen in Acts of the Apostles?
AnswerNo. The Acts of the Apostles is essentially a record of the supposed acts of Peter and Paul, perhaps even a subtle comparison of the two apostles. Apart from Stephen, who is not mentioned anywhere outside Acts, there is no real mention of the other apostles.
No. The Book of Acts is in the New Testament.
acts
It stands for the acts of the apostles. Acts is the book that describes the narrative of the early Apostles lives, focusing especially on the two most prominent of those Apostles which were Peter and Paul.
Acts of the Apostles.
Arguably the whole of the Acts of the Apostles is about the apostle Paul, but the second part is certainly about Paul.
Anytime.
It was Paul that encourage the Apostles to moved on . This is recorded in the book of ACTS
The Book of Acts is generally classified as a biblical genre known as Acts of the Apostles. It is a historical narrative that details the early spread of Christianity and the ministry of the apostles, particularly focusing on the actions of Peter and Paul.
The Apostles Creed is a profession of faith. It is a summary of the main points of the Christian faith.
Acts is sometimes referred to as 'The Acts of the Holy Spirit.'