0
Basically speaking, it is Jesus Christ. The New Testament is framed around the arrival of Christ and his works and the works of those around his times. The Old Testament of course is framed around God (and the other names He has) and the history of the world since He created it. The New Testament is God again but this time in the form of Jesus. Unfortunately, the New Testament was not agreed upon until about 400 years after Christ's death. A group of religeous and political scholars and leaders got together at a place called Nicaea to decide on which diaries 'gospels' would go into the New Testament. Since this time, other diaries 'gospels' have been found (such as the dead sea scrolls) which have caused some questions. I am not a religeous person per se but beleive that there is something bigger than us 'out there'. It doesn't matter how accurate these stories are; we all tend to remember things a bit differently. It comes down to faith. Personally, I think The Bible is a simple way of explaining evolution. Whether at was all started by 'The Big Bang' (which incidently the Catholic Church was the first to propose) or whether it all started by a supreme being, or whether a supreme being caused the 'Big Bang' or whatever it doesn't really matter. We all have our own belief or 'faith' even it we don't 'believe' we still believe in non believing.
Another Answer:
Few realize that the entire structure of the Bible is around God's divine covenants with mankind - revealing and describing the relationship God wants to have with every human being.
The capstone of these covenants is the New Covenant (New Testament) which was implemented when Jesus died at His crucifixion (Luke 22:20). In the New Covenant, God gathers together all of the carefully planned details of His plan of salvation for all mankind. If we are to benefit from this wonderful plan, it is essential that we correctly understand the meaning and purpose of the New Covenant that Christ implemented (notice it is started and not yet fully in place).
What else can I help you with?
What are the main divisions in the New Testament?
They are Gospels, History, Letters and Prophecy.
Does the New Testament override the Old Testament in terms of religious teachings and practices?
The relationship between the New Testament and the Old Testament in terms of religious teachings and practices is complex and varies among different Christian denominations. Some believe that the New Testament supersedes the Old Testament, while others view them as complementary. Ultimately, interpretations of this relationship depend on individual beliefs and theological perspectives.
Why is the study of the Old Testament basic to understanding the New Testament?
Much of the reason for events and doctrine taught in the New Testament are to be found in the Old Testament. The New Testament would be incomprehensible without the Old. The reason for Christ's coming to earth and why humankind are in need of salvation can be found in the Old Testament, particularly in Genesis.
Is colossians in the New Testament?
No, the book of Colossians is found only in the New Testament. It is attributed to Paul, who wrote after the crucifixion of Jesus.
What is the basic story of the New Testament?
The birth, ministry, sacrifice, and resurrection of Jesus.
Who wrote the highest percentage of the New Testament?
The apostle Paul wrote the highest percentage of the New Testament, contributing 13 of the 27 books. His writings include many letters to various early Christian communities and individuals, addressing theological teachings and practical guidance for living out the Christian faith.
When was New Brunswick Theological Seminary created?
New Brunswick Theological Seminary was created in 1784.
When was New Life Theological Seminary created?
New Life Theological Seminary was created in 1996.
Is John in the old or new testament?
New Testament
Why was Herod afraid of a baby?
Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.
Is Matthew in the new or Old Testament?
It is the first book in the New Testament.
Is the mathew in the old or New Testament?
The New Testament. All gospels are in the New Testament.
