You can see the geneology of Adam in Mathew chapter 1. Also in Genesis 5. Make a list and compare it with Matthew 1.
The Gospel of Luke records the details right back to Adam. (See Luke 3:38)
By alive I am going to assume you mean flesh life? The answer to that question is simply not given as all the races were created on the 6th day and there are no names or genealogy given. The only historical genealogy given does not start until the 8th day (some 2000 years later) when eth ha adam is formed, the man who tills the soil, who you refer to as Adam. The genealogy of Adam (eth ha adam) is given in several places in biblical text. Genesis, Matthew and Luke come to mind immediately. However, eth ha adam or Adam was not the first man created in this earth age.
Enos is the grandson of both Adam and Eve. He is also called Enosh in the Hebrew Bible, in the Book of Genesis.
Serge Corriveau has written: 'Jean Berlouin dit Nantel, c. 1670-1740' -- subject(s): Family, Genealogy 'Marie-Josephte dite la Corriveau' -- subject(s): Genealogy 'Famille Adam' -- subject(s): Genealogy
Differ in Mark and Luke, meaning even accepting the genealogy as accurate, it's hard to say.
The Adam to Noah family tree in the Bible is significant because it traces the lineage of important figures in the Old Testament, showing the connection between Adam, the first man, and Noah, who survived the Great Flood. This genealogy highlights the continuity of God's plan throughout history and the importance of these individuals in shaping the narrative of salvation and redemption.
The Bible only mentions Seth because it was through Seth's line that Christ would come.
No. Luke 3:23-24 (KJV) proves that this was the genealogy of Joseph: "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, which was the son of Matthat ..."
The genealogy of Jesus in the books of Luke and Matthew differ in terms of the names listed and the structure of the genealogy. Matthew traces Jesus' lineage through King David and Abraham, while Luke traces it back to Adam. Additionally, the number of generations and the order of names vary between the two accounts.
Mildred Smith has written: 'The ancestors and descendents of Johan Adam Diehm and Anna Christina' -- subject(s): Family, Genealogy
If Luke's genealogy is true, then the Old Testament genealogy for David is in error, since Luke added two names into the list of David's ancestors, that are not in the Old Testament - Admin and Kainan.Luke shows that God's promise was fulfilled in Jesus because great men occurred in multiples of 7 generations starting from Adam, with: Enoch at 7; Abraham at 21; David at 35; Jesus at 77 - this is why he had to alter the original Old Testament genealogy, which would not have given this result.
The Gospel of Luke traces Jesus' lineage through the line of David all the way to the first man, Adam. (Luke 3.23-38)