No. Luke 3:23-24 (KJV) proves that this was the genealogy of Joseph: "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, which was the son of Matthat ..."
Mary, the mother of Jesus, is believed to have descended from the lineage of King David. This genealogy is recorded in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, tracing her ancestry through David's line. Mary is also considered to be a relative of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, indicating a close bond within their family tree.
No, the Gospel of Luke is not written from Mary's perspective. We can determine that Luke likely interviewed Mary when he was working on his book, because there are things the Luke includes in his Gospel that none of the other Gospel writers include. There are things that only Mary would have known and so the fact they are in Gospel of Luke, he had to have talked to Mary to learn them.
God established His family tree, it does exist. The reason for the two different ones in Matthew and Luke is that the one in Luke is tracing the PHYSICAL lineage of Jesus; the ancestry of Mary. The account in Matthew traces Jesus' LEGAL lineage and right to the throne of David. The fact that Luke said "as was thought," reflects the fact that people in the days Jesus was on earth THOUGHT He was the physical son of Joseph. There was no doubt in Luke's mind being expressed by those words.
No, it does not have a genealogy of Christ. The Jews were proud of their genealogies and considered them very important, but Mark was targeting Romans, mainly gentiles, who couldn't care less about them. For the paternal genealogy, go to Matthew chapter 1, and to Luke 3 for the genealogy through the line of Mary.
Mary is mentioned 12 times in the gospel of Luke. She plays a prominent role in the infancy narratives surrounding the birth and early life of Jesus.
Mary's mother was Heli, named in Luke 3:23
A:Luke begins the genealogy of Jesus with (Luke 3:23) his father (as was supposed) Joseph, the son of Heli.
luke chapter 3 verse 23
The genealogy in Matthew shows that Jesus is a legal descendant of David through the royal line. This genealogy traces the legal descent of Jesus as King of Israel. Luke's genealogy concludes with Joseph, of whom Jesus was the adopted Son, the genealogy in Luke 3 probably traces the ancestry of Mary, of whom Jesus was the real Son. Jesus is legal heir to the throne of David through Joseph and the actual seed of David through Mary.
Luke 3:23-38.
Because Joseph was not Christ's father, except legally. So while the one is Jesus' paternal or 'legal' genealogy, the other, more accurate one is His maternal genealogy. Both Joseph and Mary were descendants of David.
Mary, the mother of Jesus, is believed to have descended from the lineage of King David. This genealogy is recorded in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, tracing her ancestry through David's line. Mary is also considered to be a relative of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, indicating a close bond within their family tree.
The genealogies of Matthew and Luke in the Bible differ in the names listed and the way they trace the ancestry of Jesus. Matthew's genealogy focuses on the lineage of Joseph, while Luke's genealogy traces the lineage of Mary. Additionally, the two genealogies have variations in the number of generations and the individuals mentioned.
Matthew's gospel opens with a genealogy of Jesus (Matthew 1:1-17). Luke's genealogy is presented in the third chapter of his gospel (Luke 3:23-38).
A:In Luke's genealogy, 77 men are all listed by name. In the list, there are 3 men called Joseph, in addition to the New Testament Joseph himself.
The Gospel of Luke records the details right back to Adam. (See Luke 3:38)
There is no specific relationship given in the Scriptures. Many have said that they are cousins, but there is no data to back this up. Since there is a large age difference between the two, my guess would be that Elizabeth could be Mary's aunt, great aunt, or a cousin once or twice removed.