0
Like any good historian of his era, the author of Matthew's Gospel closely followed what he regarded as a reliable source, in this case Mark's Gospel. He corrected what appeared to be mistakes, such as minor geographical errors, but used around 80 per cent of his source.
In addition to Mark's Gospel, Matthew's author also had access to a book of sayings attributed to Jesus, the 'Q' document. The 'Q' document did not provide any context for those sayings, but first-century historians were not as cautious as modern historians and would quite naturally add details about what they felt probably happened, and this is what Matthew's author did.
Similarly, where Mark said that Jesus had risen but did not provide any information about appearances of the risen Jesus (the "Long Ending", verses 16:9-20 are known to have been added much later), Matthew's author felt that if Jesus had risen he would surely have shown himself to the apostles. So, like many historians of his time, the author added what probably would have happened, thus explaining the differences between his account and those of Luke and John.
Where Matthew's Gospel departs from first-century historical tradition is in the infancy narrative and the genealogy of Jesus. Bishop Spong calls the infancy narrative "Christian midrash" for its obvious non-historicity. Father Raymond E Brown says that the genealogy is 'unlikely' to be strictly historical. Similarly, his references to prophecies and foreshadowing of Jesus, from the Old Testament, whether genuine or not, are not historical information.
What else can I help you with?
Who was the mother of St. Matthew?
We do not know the name of Matthew's mother.
Which apostle was the tax collector?
The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector. However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the list of the twelve disciples (verse 3:14-19). Luke's Gospel follows this more or less faithfully when copying from Mark.Because disciples are not supposed to just disappear, the author of the book now known as Matthew's Gospel resolved this problem by not referring to Levi, but instead saying in the corresponding place in the text that the tax collector Jesus called was Matthew.Because of the change of name in Matthew, it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person, although Mark's Gospel makes this seem unlikely.A:Matthew, also called Levi.A:(Matthew 10:3) Matthew was a tax collector (Matthew 9:9; Mark 2:14).
What is the main message of the Gospel of Matthew?
The words, "...that it might be fulfilled..." are used nearly a dozen times in Matthew. It's Matthew's way of saying, "Because He fulfilled all these Messianic Scriptures, Jesus is the Messiah."
Did Matthew really hear Jesus preach the kingdom of heaven?
A:One way in which Matthew's Gospel is unique is in its frequent references to the 'kingdom of heaven'. One would indeed expect that Matthew listened to Jesus preaching the kingdom of heaven. Mark's Gospel and Luke's Gospel frequently mentions Jesus talking of the 'kingdom of God', but not the kingdom of heaven, but not the kingdom of heaven. John makes just two references to the kingdom of God. Scholars say that the disciple Matthew did not write the Gospel that now bears his name, in fact they say that the Gospel could not even have been written by an eyewitness to the life and mission of Jesus. It is significant that all the New Testament Gospels were originally anonymous and only attributed by the Church Fathers to the apostles whose names they now bear, later in the second century.When read in the original Greek, it is clear that there is a literary dependency among the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, with a less obvious dependency in the case of John's Gospel. Many passages in the synoptic gospels are actually identical in the Greek language. Because of this, the Church Fathers decided that Matthew was written first, and that Mark and Lukewere written as copies of Matthew. However, it is clear that the author of Luke was unaware of Matthew. Moreover, scholars have demonstrated that Matthew and Luke must have been based on Mark, with both authors also relying on the hypothetical 'Q' document for further sayings attributed to Jesus, as well as providing, in each case, other material unique to that Gospel. Anyone who had known Jesus would not have had to rely so heavily on Mark and Q.We can therefore say that 'Matthew', the author of Matthew's Gospel did not hear Jesus preach anything, whether about the kingdom of heaven or otherwise.
Was Matthew's Gospel written for a Jewish audience?
Another answer from our community:If you mean 'was Matthew originally written in aramaic' then the answer is "possibly". If you mean "was it written for a Jewish audience" then the answer is definitely yes.
Why does Matthew present Jesus as the Jewish Messiah?
A:Tradition says that Matthew's Gospel was written by the disciple Matthew, and based on this it would seem that Matthew presented Jesus as the Jewish messiah because he learnt as a disciple to regard Jesus as the messiah.In fact, Matthew was originally anonymous and was only attributed to the disciple Matthew later in the second century. New Testament scholars have established that Matthew was actually based on Mark's Gospel, and includes around 90 per cent of the verses from Mark, often in exactly the same words in the Greek language. Matthew presents Jesus as the Jewish messiah because Mark had done so.
Why is Matthew's Gospel placed first in the New Testament?
The author we know as Matthew used the Gospel According to Mark as his primary source for information about the life of Jesus. But he added to this, using sayings from a sayings gospel we call the Q document. Unlike Mark's Gospel, the Gospel According to Matthew also contains a version of the story of the birth of Jesus, and his genealogy back through Joseph and King David.
How did St. Matthew live his life?
St. Matthew (active 1st century), one of the Apostles chosen by Jesus, is traditionally considered the author of the First Gospel. The first recorded information of Matthew tells of a meeting between him and Jesus. At that time Matthew's name was Levi; he was the son of Alphaeus. He was sitting at his tax collector's desk near the Sea of Galilee when Jesus told him to follow him (Matthew 9:9; Mark 2:14). Levi did this promptly. It is supposed that Jesus, as he did in other cases, gave Levi another name, Matthew, meaning "gift of Yahweh." After this event Matthew Levi threw a feast for Jesus and his companions in his own house (Luke 5:9). Apart from some other passing references to him, there are no further precise details concerning Matthew's life, except that he seems to have been associated closely with the Apostle Thomas in the ministry of preaching the Gospel (Matthew 9:3; Mark 3:13-19; Luke 6:13-16). The Apostles of Jesus generally worked in pairs, and the above texts seem to associate Thomas and Matthew. It is not known how or where Matthew ended his life. Traditions and legends differ as to whether he died a martyr's death or of natural causes. Outside the New Testament, the most ancient and authoritative reference to Matthew is found in fragments of a work by Papias (born ca. A.D. 70), who apparently knew some of the early Apostles, including Matthew. Papias tells us that "Matthew wrote down the sayings in the Hebrew language." The "sayings" refer to the oral traditions concerning Jesus which circulated after his death. Scholars generally agree that the term "Hebrew" in Papias's mouth refers to the Aramaic language and not to Hebrew. This testimony of Papias, in addition to extensive examination of the Gospel text, has led most modern critics to conclude that the First Gospel is a Greek text modeled on an Aramaic original which has been lost. Modern research has not been able to decide definitively whether Matthew was the author of the First Gospel in its present Greek form or in the Aramaic original. The framework of the present Greek Gospel of Matthew seems to have been taken from the Gospel of Mark, but the author of the First Gospel filled in the gaps between units of the Marcan text with material drawn from another source. This source, it has been surmised, may have been the original Aramaic text. Matthew also introduced collections of sayings which Mark apparently did not possess. According to Matthew, also, the content of the Gospel message is not the life and personality of Jesus but the doctrine and the preaching of Jesus, by which he gave a new and final interpretation to the Law of Moses. Matthew's Gospel is also the one which makes abundant use of Old Testament texts and a rabbinic method of exegesis in order to establish the authenticity of Jesus as the expected Messiah of Israel. Finally, Matthew stresses the ecclesiastical aspect of Jesus' preaching and his new movement. The composition of the First Gospel in its present Greek form is generally assigned to the years 75-80. Further Reading For information on Matthew consult George D. Kilpatrick, The Origins of the Gospel according to St. Matthew (1946), and Krister Stendahl, The School of St. Matthew and Its Use of the Old Testament (1954).
How does knowing that the gospel of Matthew was written in respect to the fall of the Jerusalem Temple help understanding?
Matthew's Gospel was written around fifteen years after the fall of the Jerusalem Temple. It was Mark's Gospel that was written at the time of the fall of the Temple, and it makes clear allusions to the destruction of the Temple and the many fine buildings (chapter 13) as a portent of the end of the world within the lifetimes of those to whom Jesus spoke. By the time of Matthew's Gospel, the generation had passed and the fall of the Temple could no longer be described as a harbinger of the end of the world. The author, while copying Mark as faithfully as possible, changed the position of the sentence about "this generation", relative to the destruction of the great buildings, so that it referred to something else altogether (Matthew 24:34). He added, and emphasised, material where Jesus told the disciples that the end is not yet, and that no man knows when the end of the world will occur.
Gospel song with what is this makes you love?
a song of praise ....
In the Bible was Matthew the brother of James the son of Alphaeus?
A:The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector. However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the list of the twelve disciples (verse 3:14-19). Since Levi and James are both sons of Alphaeus, it would seem that they must have been brothers. John is described as the brother of James, son of Zebedee, in the list in which the disciples are introduced, but Matthew is not described either as the son of Alphaeus or as the brother of this James. There is therefore no reason to believe that the author of Mark was portraying Matthew as either the tax collector or as the brother of James, son of Alphaeus. Because Mark does not refer to Levi again, this causes a possible problem for the authors of the other New Testament gospels that are now known to have been derived from Mark's Gospel. Luke more or less faithfully copies Mark, using the name Levi in the corresponding place, as the former tax collector, while John makes no mention of him. The author of the gospel now known as Matthew's Gospel tried to resolve this difficulty by placing the disciple Matthew in the position of the tax collector whom Jesus called to follow him. Because of this usage in Matthew, it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person. Although Matthew's Gospel does not say so, this could mean that Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, should be brothers.
Were Matthew and James the Less brothers?
A:The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector. However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the list of the twelve disciples (verse 3:14-19). Since Levi and James are both sons of Alphaeus, it would seem that they must have been brothers. John is described as the brother of James, son of Zebedee, in the list in which the disciples are introduced, but Matthew is not described either as the son of Alphaeus or as the brother of this James. There is therefore no reason to believe that the author of Mark was portraying Matthew as either the tax collector or as the brother of James, son of Alphaeus. Because Mark does not refer to Levi again, this causes a possible problem for the authors of the other New Testament gospels that are now known to have been derived from Mark's Gospel. Luke more or less faithfully copies Mark, using the name Levi in the corresponding place, as the former tax collector, while John makes no mention of him. The author of the gospel now known as Matthew's Gospel tried to resolve the difficulty by placing the disciple Matthew in the position of the tax collector whom Jesus called to follow him. Because of this usage in Matthew, it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person. Although Matthew's Gospel does not say so, this could mean that Matthew was a son of Alphaeus and that James was his brother.
